2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13742-015-0069-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
138
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
138
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of the reads was checked using FastQC v0.10.1 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) and was preprocessed using Trimmomatic v0.30 for paired-end sequencing (6) and NextClip v1.3 for mate pair sequencing (7). The reads were assembled using Canu v1.6 for PacBio reads (8) and SOAPdenovo v2.04 for Illumina reads (9) and were merged using HaploMerger2 v.20151124 (10). The draft genome of H.…”
Section: Announcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the reads was checked using FastQC v0.10.1 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) and was preprocessed using Trimmomatic v0.30 for paired-end sequencing (6) and NextClip v1.3 for mate pair sequencing (7). The reads were assembled using Canu v1.6 for PacBio reads (8) and SOAPdenovo v2.04 for Illumina reads (9) and were merged using HaploMerger2 v.20151124 (10). The draft genome of H.…”
Section: Announcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 3,051,328 reads and 762,832,000 clean bases were generated and were assembled into 311 contigs (171con-tigs of Ն1,000 bp) with an N 50 length of 110,446 bp using the SOAPdenovo program (20). Plasmid finishing was achieved by a PCR-based strategy and Sanger sequencing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We subjected the publication to a number of data models including ISA-TAB, Research Object, and Nanopublications and despite managing to exactly recreate all of the results listed in the paper, it identified a small number of inaccuracies in the interpretation and discussion [27]. Due to these deficiencies being uncovered, the authors produced a correction article to officially communicate the amendment to their initial report [50]. The open, detailed and transparent approach to reviewing data and methods used by GigaScience has also uncovered methodological problems in companion papers published in other journals.…”
Section: Lessons Learned In Reproducible Data Publishingmentioning
confidence: 99%