2008
DOI: 10.1139/z08-025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum — Spatiotemporal variation in activity of bat species differing in hunting tactics: effects of weather, moonlight, food abundance, and structural clutter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Species-specific variation may be also due to differential sensitivity to weather between species of different foraging strategies (e.g. Ciechanowski et al 2007;Meyer et al 2011). We found that 7 to 15 nights were required to reach a threshold of 95 % similarity in species richness, mostly depending on the habitat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Species-specific variation may be also due to differential sensitivity to weather between species of different foraging strategies (e.g. Ciechanowski et al 2007;Meyer et al 2011). We found that 7 to 15 nights were required to reach a threshold of 95 % similarity in species richness, mostly depending on the habitat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…temperature effect on mating calls; Kusch and Idelberger 2005), or foraging (e.g. the fog which could absorb echolocation calls; Ciechanowski et al 2007). The degree of confidence in this metric may also be limited by differences in detection range between species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Design Ltd, Cheltenham, UK) (Roche et al, 2011). Bat activity is associated with greater biomass of prey (Ciechanowski, Zając, Bitas, & Dunajski, 2007; Tibbels & Kurta, 2003; Verboom & Spoelstra, 1999). Bat activity is used as a proxy for bat abundance in research literature (Kerbiriou et al, 2018; Newson, Evans, & Gillings, 2015) and strongly correlated with minimum bat abundance in our data set (Appendix S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%