2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4994272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “The image-charge correction for curved field emitters” [Phys. Plasmas 24, 073107 (2017)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strides achieved in the past decades in our ability to pattern arrays of pointed emitters [3][4][5] and the discovery of carbon nanotubes (CNT) as a suitable material 6,7 for stable operation, have led to vigorous research activity in this direction. These efforts are supported by theoretical studies on large area field emitters (LAFE) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and corrections for nano-tipped emitters [15][16][17] to the planar Fowler-Nordheim (FN) formula for current density [18][19][20][21] . Despite this progress, there are several challenges in our ability to predict theoretically, the current emitted by a single emitter or a cluster of emitters placed randomly or in an array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strides achieved in the past decades in our ability to pattern arrays of pointed emitters [3][4][5] and the discovery of carbon nanotubes (CNT) as a suitable material 6,7 for stable operation, have led to vigorous research activity in this direction. These efforts are supported by theoretical studies on large area field emitters (LAFE) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and corrections for nano-tipped emitters [15][16][17] to the planar Fowler-Nordheim (FN) formula for current density [18][19][20][21] . Despite this progress, there are several challenges in our ability to predict theoretically, the current emitted by a single emitter or a cluster of emitters placed randomly or in an array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…78 The uniform emitter surface may be a valid assumption in some cases, but emitters with the tip apex radius of curvature r tip of a few nanometers down to single-atom 75 will require the consideration of the bulk and surface band structure. Comparing to the impact of such three-dimensional-shape effects on the current-voltage characteristics of field emitters, [79][80][81][82] their influences on the wave function are not much studied yet. Interestingly, the estimated full width at the half maximum of the wave function at the surface of a "point" emitter equal to 0.7 nm (at the surface field of 5 GV/m, with the corresponding r 0 ¼ 0.42 nm) is consistent with the sub-nanometer resolution of the field emission microscope for sub-nanometer-r tip emitters based on the electron optical analysis 23,83 and agrees with the values observed in the experiments.…”
Section: F Further Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, both the image and external potential get modified. The image potential takes the form [13][14][15] −…”
Section: Curvature Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing use of nanostructured materials such as carbon nanotubes, nanowires and nanocones [1][2][3][4][5] in field emission cathodes, the need for an extension to the Fowler-Nordheim (FN) formalism [6][7][8][9][10][11] to deal with emission from nano-tipped emitters is recognized [12][13][14][15][16] . For emitters with apex radius of curvature R a in the nanometer regime, there are competing influences that determine the net field emission current from an isolated emitter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%