Erratum to: 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis

Ansaloni, Luca; Pisano, Michele; Catena, Fausto; Peitzmann, Andrew; Fingerhut, Abe; Agresta, Ferdinando; Allegri, A; Bailey, Ian; Balogh, Zsolt J.; Bendinelli, Cino; Biffl, Walter L.; Bonavina, Luigi; Borzellino, Giuseppe; Brunetti, Francesco; Burlew, Clay Cothren; Camapanelli, G.; Campanile, Fabio Cesare; Ceresoli, Marco; Chiara, Osvaldo; Civil, Ian; Coimbra, Raúl; Moya, Mark De; Saverio, Salomone Di; Fraga, Gustavo Pereira; Gupta, Sanjay; Kashuk, Jeffry L.; Kelly, Michael D.; Khokha, Vladimir; Jeekel, Hans; Latifi, Rifat; Leppäniemi, Ari; Maier, Ronald V.; Marzi, Ingo; Moore, F A; Piazzalunga, Dario; Sakakushev, Boris; Sartelli, Massimo; Scalea, Thomas M.; Stahel, Philip F.; Taviloğlu, Korhan; Tugnoli, Gregorio; Uraneus, S.; Velmahos, George C.; Wani, Iftikhar H; Weber, Dieter; Viale, Pierluigi; Sugrue, Michael; Ivatury, Rao R.; Kluger, Yoram; Gurusamy, Kurinchi Selvan; Moore, Ernest E.

doi:10.1186/s13017-016-0088-z

Cited by 12 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…LC has gradually become the technique of choice for symptomatic gallstones also in the pediatric age (6). Compared with open cholecystectomy, this procedure has several advantages including less post-operative pain, a short recovery period, faster return to unrestricted activities and better cosmetic results.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholecystic Disease in Children: Defining Surgical Timing

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for gallbladder (GB) pathologies. We evaluated clinical, ultrasonographic (US) data as well as histopathological findings in children affected with symptomatic cholecystic disease (SCD) who underwent LC, with the aim of defining surgical timing. Methods: We reviewed our cases who underwent elective LC (ELC) or urgent LC (ULC). Clinical, US, surgical and histological features were used to create different risk scores. Results: We considered 26 children (17 ELC/9 ULC). US signs were not different in the two groups (p > 0.05). Operating times were longer in ELC than in ULC (p = 0.01). Histopathological evaluation revealed fibrosis and atrophy in both ELC and ULC. The clinical risk score was higher in ELC compared to ULC (p < 0.001). An increased operative risk score was noted in patients with systemic inflammatory signs (OR1.98), lithotherapy (OR1.4.3) and wall thickening ≥3 mm (OR2.6). An increased histopathological risk score was detected in children with symptom duration >7 days (OR3.61), concomitant hematological disease (OR1.23) and lithotherapy (OR3.61). Conclusion: Criteria adopted in adults cannot be adopted to detect the severity of GB damage in children. A dedicated clinical and US score is mandatory to define the most appropriate surgical timing.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for calculous cholecystitis is the current standard of care for GB pathologies in children (6). To date no evidence regarding a correlation between clinical severity and histopathological findings have been identified in the pediatric age.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholecystic Disease in Children: Defining Surgical Timing

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The time limit for early LC is defined in some studies as the first 72 hours following symptom onset, [16][17][18] and in other studies, it is describe as the first 1 to 10 days. [19][20][21][22][23] Regardless of the timing of the concept of "early", all of the above-mentioned studies showed that early LC was associated with a reduction in the length of stay, workdays lost, and costs without an increase in conversion or perioperative complications. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Another important issue in the delayed group (1-8 weeks) is gallstone-related morbidity during the waiting period for a cholecystectomy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[19][20][21][22][23] Regardless of the timing of the concept of "early", all of the above-mentioned studies showed that early LC was associated with a reduction in the length of stay, workdays lost, and costs without an increase in conversion or perioperative complications. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Another important issue in the delayed group (1-8 weeks) is gallstone-related morbidity during the waiting period for a cholecystectomy. [16][17][18]21,23] The most common morbidity is the non-resolution or recurrence of cholecystitis, which occurred in 18.3-29.5%…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: importance of first 72 hours and oxidative stress markers

Onuk

Gündüz

Koç

et al. 2019

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: This prospective randomized study aims to compare outcomes between immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and same admission delayed LC in patients with acute cholecystitis and also to investigate the relation between oxidative stress markers and complication rates in the patients with AC. METHODS: This study included 64 patients with AC who were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in Group 1 (n=32) were immediately administered LC, while in Group 2 (n=32) patients underwent transient LC following medical treatment. All patients were operated on their first hospitalization. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups for the comparison of complications, conversion rates, or operation durations (p>0.05). The length of postoperative hospital stay was found to be significantly shorter in group 1 compared to group 2 (1.75 vs 2.93 days; p=0.024). Only the total antioxidant status result was significantly higher in group 1 (p=0.017), but the finding was not correlated with complications. CONCLUSION: LC for AC was performed during the first admission was found to be safe, even beyond 72 hours following symptom onset. Pre-operative oxidative stress markers did not correlate with the complication rates.

show abstract

“…In a meta-analysis including 9 randomized controlled trials, a total of 23% had a failure of conservative treatment (without any corticosteroid). [ 18 ] The high rate of successful treatment confirmed the effectiveness of the corticosteroid, and the immunological contributing factor of the AAC in the SLE patients. The use of high-dose methylprednisolone plays roles in immune-suppress as well as anti-inflammation for non-infectious etiological factors such as vasculitis or severe inflammation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Successful treatment using corticosteroid combined antibiotic for acute acalculous cholecystitis patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Liu

Chen²,

He³

et al. 2017

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is no consensus of treatments for acute acalculous cholecystitis with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The study was aimed to investigate the effect of the corticosteroid for these patients.A series of patients who were diagnosed as acute acalculous cholecystitis with SLE in the period from January 2012 to December 2016 at our hospital were included. They accepted 2 different conservative treatment strategies initially: the treatment using moxifloxacin (the antibiotic group), and the treatment using corticosteroid combined moxifloxacin (the corticosteroid group). Then clinical manifestations, laboratory features, and outcomes were analyzed.The study identified 22 women Han Chinese patients with the SLE history of 2.8 ± 1.4 year. There was no significant difference in SLE history, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2000), Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index (SLICC/ACR), hematologic examination results, and corticosteroid dosage between 2 groups. And there was no significant difference in the symptom of acute cholecystitis, duration of the symptoms, white blood level, and the thickness of gallbladder wall between 2 groups either. However, the SLEDAI-2000 of the corticosteroid group was lower than that of the antibiotic group (7.3 ± 1.4 vs 10.7 ± 3.0, P = .03), so was the SLICC/ACR (0.1 ± 0.3 vs 0.3 ± 0.5, P = .01). Moreover, total 11 of 12 patients were successfully treated in the corticosteroid group, only 1 patient got cholecystectomy because no improvement after conservative treatment. While 4 of 10 patients were successfully treated by moxifloxacin alone, 6 patients had to accept cholecystectomy in the antibiotic group. The rate of successful conservative treatment in the corticosteroid group was higher than that of the antibiotic group (P = .02). All patients were followed up at least 6 months, there was no statistical difference in the rate of recurrence of abdominal pain between 2 groups (P = .37).The corticosteroid plays an important role in the management of the acalculous cholecystitis patient with SLE, and it should be considered as a first line of treatment.

show abstract

Erratum to: 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis

Abstract: Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error in the spelling of an author's name. The surname is written as Koka, but should be spelt as Khokha.

Cited by 12 publications

References 1 publication

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholecystic Disease in Children: Defining Surgical Timing

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholecystic Disease in Children: Defining Surgical Timing

The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: importance of first 72 hours and oxidative stress markers

Successful treatment using corticosteroid combined antibiotic for acute acalculous cholecystitis patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About