2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: “Derivation of covariant dissipative fluid dynamics in the renormalization-group method” [Phys. Lett. B 646 (2007) 134]

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another form of global equilibrium, which is a special case of eq. (2.6) is the pure rotation, with b = (1/T 0 , 0) and ̟ ∝ ω 0 /T 0 such that: 8) which has recently raised much attention for fermions [43,44]. In order to represent a physical fluid at equilibrium, β must be a timelike vector.…”
Section: Jhep10(2017)091mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another form of global equilibrium, which is a special case of eq. (2.6) is the pure rotation, with b = (1/T 0 , 0) and ̟ ∝ ω 0 /T 0 such that: 8) which has recently raised much attention for fermions [43,44]. In order to represent a physical fluid at equilibrium, β must be a timelike vector.…”
Section: Jhep10(2017)091mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also means that the EOS is given by, p 0 = p 0 (e 0 , n 0 ), and the temperature and chemical potential are fixed by the equilibrium state. Alternatively one could use different matching conditions [13] or even different thermodynamical theories, see for example Refs. [14,15,16].…”
Section: The Methods Of Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We give a general proof without recourse to numerical calculations that the hydrodynamic equations obtained in our formalism certainly ensure the stability of steady states including the thermal equilibrium state, on the basis of the positive definiteness of the inner product. * ) In a previous short communication, 36) we discussed the equation obtained with an erroneous setting θ = −π/4. We note that this choice is not appropriate and the resulting equation should be abandoned since −π/4 is out of the range of θ (4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%