2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9580-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: Effects of Second Language Usage on Genetic Counseling Training and Supervision

Abstract: Due to a production error, the following text was erroneously changed from the original text. The corrections are as follows: & On page 3, in the 2nd paragraph under the subhead Instrumentation, where it says "Purpose of the Study" it should read "Section 1 of the questionnaire." In the same paragraph, where it says "Methods," it should read "Section 2 of the questionnaire." And where it says "Results," it should read "section 3 of the questionnaire." & On page 5, in the first sentence under the subhead Studen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining 32 studies were read in full. From these papers, 19 and two erratum (Atzinger et al, ; Vanneste, Chiu, Russell, & Fitzpatrick, ; analyzed as part of the 19 articles, and hereafter will be referred to as 19 articles) matched the criteria for review (see Figure ). While we were not specifically looking for articles pertaining to North American training, all resulting papers were sampled from participants in the United States and Canada.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 32 studies were read in full. From these papers, 19 and two erratum (Atzinger et al, ; Vanneste, Chiu, Russell, & Fitzpatrick, ; analyzed as part of the 19 articles, and hereafter will be referred to as 19 articles) matched the criteria for review (see Figure ). While we were not specifically looking for articles pertaining to North American training, all resulting papers were sampled from participants in the United States and Canada.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%