Erratum to “Evaluation of a health service adopting proactive approach to reduce high risk of lung cancer: The Liverpool Healthy Lung Programme” [Lung Cancer 134 (August) (2019) 66–71]

Ghimire, Bhagabati; Maroni, Roberta; Vulkan, Daniel; Shah, Zoheb; Gaynor, E; Timoney, M; Jones, Lisa; Arvanitis, R; Ledson, M.J.; Lukehirst, Linda; Rutherford, P. H.; Clarke, F. A. H.; Gardner, Katy; Marcus, Michael W.; Hill, Sarah; Fidoe, Darcy; Mason, Sabrina; Smith, Samuel G.; Quaife, Samantha L; Fitzgerald, Karen; Poirier, Véronique; Duffy, Stephen W.; Field, John K.

doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.10.007

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the UK, a number of pilots have shown promising results in terms of participation rates of 40 to 50%, good early stage detection rates, and low rates of harm, especially in those eventually shown not to have cancer. 29,38,42,62 Screening programmes require robust local and national quality assurance systems underpinned by agreed protocols and standards, such as those available in the USA 16,17 and UK. 18,19 These cover all aspects of screening including administration, the screening process and evaluation as well as defining the responsibilities of individuals running the programme.…”

Section: Cost-effectivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

An update on CT screening for lung cancer: the first major targeted cancer screening programme

Baldwin

Callister

2020

BJR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Screening for lung cancer with low radiation dose CT has been shown to be effective in reducing lung cancer mortality by two major randomised controlled trials. Lung cancer screening is set to become the largest targeted cancer screening programme globally, but the effectiveness of the programme is dependent on many different factors. This article describes the key evidence for lung cancer screening, the key factors important for optimisation and the progress towards implementation.

show abstract

Section: Cost-effectivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

An update on CT screening for lung cancer: the first major targeted cancer screening programme

Baldwin

Callister

2020

BJR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 12 The Liverpool Healthy Lung Programme found that a community-based proactive approach was effective in reaching and screening for LC in deprived areas. 13 However, very few of these studies were pragmatic RCTs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recruitment strategies and interventions to increase participation in lung cancer screening programmes: a systematic review protocol

Djuric,

Venturelli,

Bassi

et al. 2023

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionDespite strong evidence for the efficacy of low-radiation dose CT (LDCT) in reducing lung cancer (LC) mortality, implementing LC screening (LCS) programmes remains a challenge. We aim to systematically review the evidence on the strategies used to recruit the adult population at risk of LC to LDCT within LCS programmes and to estimate the effectiveness of interventions identified, used to reach the potentially eligible population, increase participation and informed choice, and ensure equitable access.Methods and analysisThis sequential systematic literature review will consist of three steps: (1) a scoping review of existing strategies and organisational models for LCS; (2) selecting papers reporting relevant outcomes (test coverage, screening participation and informed choice) and comparing results among different models; (3) a systematic review of interventions implemented to increase participation in LCS programmes. Each step will follow the methodological guidelines provided by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Data sources include electronic databases such as Medline (PubMed version), Embase, CINAHL (Ebsco version), Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL. The search will be limited to studies published from January 2000 to March 2023 in English, Italian, French, Spanish, Serbian and Croatian language. Findings will be synthesised quantitatively and qualitatively as appropriate. Risk of bias assessment will be only applied to studies selected in the second and third steps. The quality of evidence will be summarised for each outcome using the Grading Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology.Ethics and disseminationGiven that this is a review of existing literature, ethics approval is not required. The results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at relevant conferences. The findings of this review will help guide health authorities in organising LCS programmes and developing recommendations, policies, and actions at national and regional levels.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023408357.

show abstract

Erratum to “Evaluation of a health service adopting proactive approach to reduce high risk of lung cancer: The Liverpool Healthy Lung Programme” [Lung Cancer 134 (August) (2019) 66–71]

Abstract: The publisher regrets the author Darcy Fidoe was incorrectly spelt as Darcy Fideo.The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

An update on CT screening for lung cancer: the first major targeted cancer screening programme

An update on CT screening for lung cancer: the first major targeted cancer screening programme

Recruitment strategies and interventions to increase participation in lung cancer screening programmes: a systematic review protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About