1976
DOI: 10.2307/2041646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to "Generalized Relative Difference Sets"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only examples of RDS's with the parameters of Theorem 6.4 known to us are cyclic (7, 2, 4, 1) --and (31, 2, 16, 4) -RDS's, see Lain [22]. Since n = 2, here, these examples of course do not admit 2 as a multiplier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The only examples of RDS's with the parameters of Theorem 6.4 known to us are cyclic (7, 2, 4, 1) --and (31, 2, 16, 4) -RDS's, see Lain [22]. Since n = 2, here, these examples of course do not admit 2 as a multiplier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…By a computer search, Lam [8] found a (21, 6, 16, 2)-relative difference set in a cyclic group of order 126. Note that q=4, d=3 and n=2(q&1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%