Associated acute and long-term medical complications of COVID-19 beyond respiratory illness include acute ischemic stroke (AIS). [1][2][3][4][5] Hypercoagulability, inflammation, cardiac dysfunction, and endothelial inflammation that occur during the infectious phase can lead to thrombotic events and thus cerebral ischemia. 6 Reported risks of stroke in COVID-19 have varied substantially across studies. 7 Most studies have focused on AIS incidence in patients diagnosed during or upon hospitalization. Unlike any other infectious disease in modern times and as a result of the need to trace and monitor for outbreaks to prevent the spread of COVID-19, a very large number of patients have been screened for COVID-19 at the time of hospital admission. This screening has identified both asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals with COVID-19, thus making it more difficult to determine whether and in whom COVID-19 may increase the risk of AIS and whether the association is true or incidental. In this issue of Neurology ® , Yang et al. 8 evaluated the estimated incidence rate ratio of AIS after COVID-19 infection in a known high-risk group-patients older than 65-and determined the time frame of highest risk of AIS associated with COVID-19 within this population. 8 The authors used inpatient and outpatient fee-for-service Medicare claims to identify 37,379 patients with COVID-19 and AIS between January 2019 and February 2021. 8 A pre-COVID diagnosis phase was used to account for unknown possible inoculation times and the time frame from COVID-19 billing diagnosis to stroke billing diagnosis code of up to 28 days was evaluated. 8 Applying the self-controlled case series method, the authors found that the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were highest within 3 days of diagnosis of COVID-19, with an odds ratio of 10.3 (95% confidence interval 9.86-10.8), and that the estimated IRR was higher in those between ages 65 and 74 without a prior history of stroke. 8 By contrast, the association between stroke and COVID-19 was weaker 15-28 days after the initial diagnosis, suggesting that AIS rarely manifests as a long-term COVID-19 sequela in elderly patients. 8 Major strengths of the study are the inclusion of COVID-19 cases diagnosed both in outpatient and inpatient settings, the inclusion of a large number of patients from minority groups, and the use of robust statistical methods, such as the self-case-controlled case study, which has the advantage of implicit control for all fixed confounding effects. The authors made a great effort to verify that all assumptions were not violated, albeit with some modifications. They solidified the findings of their study by performing a number of sensitivity analyses.Interpretation of the study results should consider potential limitations, which were described by Yang et al. 8 These limitations stem primarily from the retrospective nature of the analysis and the use of administrative claims to identify cases of COVID-19 and AIS. As the Medicare data are updated monthly, cases of COVID-19 and death...