Erratum to “Relationship between appearance of tongue carcinoma on intraoral ultrasonography and histopathologic findings” [Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014, vol 117, pp 634-639]

Shinozaki, Yasuhisa; Jinbu, Yoshinori; Ito, Hiroto; Noguchi, Tadahide; Kusama, Mikio; Matsumoto, Naoyuki; Komiyama, Kanki; Taniguchi, Nobuyuki

doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2014.06.010

Cited by 6 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the UICC and AJCC state that ultrasonography is not suitable for the evaluation of primary lesions [9], some studies have evaluated primary lesions with intraoral ultrasonography (US) and have shown a strong correlation with histopathological thickness or DOI [10][11][12][13]. To date, several reports have been made on CT, MRI, and US preoperative radiological DOI evaluations, but there is no report of a study where these were all performed in a single institution [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Therefore, this study was aimed to investigate the accuracy of preoperative radiological DOI measurement with CT, MRI, and US in the same target group based on histopathologically measured DOI for T1 and T2 tongue cancers, where a diagnosis of DOI around 5 mm is an important diagnostic finding and examine the effectiveness of each imaging modalities with retrospective approach.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study between CT, MRI, and intraoral US for the evaluation of the depth of invasion in early stage (T1/T2) tongue squamous cell carcinoma

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives This study aimed to clarify the accuracy of intraoral ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative image depth of invasion (DOI) measurement of T1/T2 tongue cancer through comparison with histopathological measurements. Methods Imaging of the primary lesions was performed at our hospital; the lesions were classified into T1 and T2 based on the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC, and surgery performed. There was histopathological confirmation of lesions as squamous cell carcinoma in 48 patients with tongue cancer. T3 and T4 cases, cases in which preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy were performed, and cases where biopsy was performed before imaging were excluded. The radiological DOI in US, CT, and MRI and the histopathological DOI as base were comparatively investigated and statistical analyses were performed by Bland–Altman analysis and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Results Bland–Altman analysis showed that the US radiological DOI was overestimated by an average of 0.2 mm compared to the histopathological DOI, while CT and MRI radiological DOI were overestimated by an average of 2–3 mm. The comparison of CT and MRI revealed that the difference between the MRI and histopathological DOI, as well as the 95% limit of agreement, were smaller than those of the CT radiological DOI. Conclusions US is the most accurate preoperative diagnostic tool for T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinoma; CT and MRI tend to have an overestimation of about 2–3 mm and so caution is required.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study between CT, MRI, and intraoral US for the evaluation of the depth of invasion in early stage (T1/T2) tongue squamous cell carcinoma

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ultrasonographic examinations have widespread indications, but until recently, few examinations have been evaluated in dentistry. [32][33][34] In conclusion, the ultrasonography technique with portable equipment may offer a unique system for determining the viability of soft tissue affecting hard tissue. The results indicate that the mental foramen may be reduced in size in patients with permanent NSD of the IAN, but no significant correlation was found between a reduced size and the degree of reduced sensibility of the IAN.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultrasonographic pilot study of mental foramen size, with and without postoperative neurosensory dysfunction

Møystad

Bjørnland

Friedland

et al. 2015

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…US can be used as a preoperative noninvasive tool with which to assess the histological structure of tongue cancer [2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Hayashi [15] reported that US should be routinely used as a standard technique to evaluate the depth of tumor invasion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Preoperative ultrasonography (US) assessment is useful to noninvasively predict the prognosis of tongue cancer [2,3]. Some reports have demonstrated the usefulness of intraoral US for delineating the shape of the tumor margin, internal echo signal, tumor extent, and depth of invasion [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. US images reflect the histological structure of tongue cancers, even superficial carcinomas [2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimation of prognosis of tongue cancer using tumor depth and margin shape obtained from ultrasonography

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of using ultrasoundobtained tumor depth (TD) and margin shape (MS) to predict the prognosis of tongue cancer. Methods Fifty-two Japanese patients with tongue cancer who underwent ultrasound examination between 2007 and 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. TD was measured at the deepest portion of the tumor. MS was classified as ''pressure,'' ''wedge-shaped,'' or ''permeated.'' Prognosis was assessed by local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and overall survival rate. We classified the patients into a good prognosis group and poor prognosis group. Relationships among TD, MS, and patient prognosis were evaluated using Spearman rank correlation. A regression formula to predict prognosis using TD and MS was derived.Results The correlation between TD and MS was significant (Spearman rank correlation q = 0.552, p \ 0.01).Using a structure matrix, we identified the contribution of both predictors from an ultrasound image. The contribution of TD was 0.796, while that of MS was better at 0.906. The prognosis could be predicted using the following regression formula: D ¼ À2:801 þ 0:093x þ 0:872y, where D prognosis (risk probability), x = TD (mm), and y = MS (grade). The average value for good risk probability was -0.254 (standard deviation, 0.962), while that for poor risk probability was 0.566 (standard deviation, 1.08) (p \ 0.05). The cut-off value for classifying cases was -0.00169. Using the formula above, 73.1 % of patients in the poor prognosis group were correctly classified.Conclusions MS and TD are useful predictors of tongue cancer prognosis.

show abstract

Erratum to “Relationship between appearance of tongue carcinoma on intraoral ultrasonography and histopathologic findings” [Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014, vol 117, pp 634-639]

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

A comparative study between CT, MRI, and intraoral US for the evaluation of the depth of invasion in early stage (T1/T2) tongue squamous cell carcinoma

A comparative study between CT, MRI, and intraoral US for the evaluation of the depth of invasion in early stage (T1/T2) tongue squamous cell carcinoma

Ultrasonographic pilot study of mental foramen size, with and without postoperative neurosensory dysfunction

Estimation of prognosis of tongue cancer using tumor depth and margin shape obtained from ultrasonography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About