Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The scaling dimensions of charged operators in conformal field theory have recently been predicted to exhibit universal behavior in the large charge limit. We verify this behavior in the 2+1 dimensional CP N −1 model. Specifically, we numerically compute the scaling dimensions of the lowest dimension monopole operators with charges Q = 1, 2, · · · , 100 to subleading order in large N . The coefficients of the large Q expansion are extracted through a fit, and the predicted universal O(Q 0 ) contribution is verified to the subpercent level. arXiv:1805.00501v1 [hep-th] 1 May 2018
The scaling dimensions of charged operators in conformal field theory have recently been predicted to exhibit universal behavior in the large charge limit. We verify this behavior in the 2+1 dimensional CP N −1 model. Specifically, we numerically compute the scaling dimensions of the lowest dimension monopole operators with charges Q = 1, 2, · · · , 100 to subleading order in large N . The coefficients of the large Q expansion are extracted through a fit, and the predicted universal O(Q 0 ) contribution is verified to the subpercent level. arXiv:1805.00501v1 [hep-th] 1 May 2018
We include vortices in the superfluid EFT for four dimensional CFTs at large global charge. Using the state-operator correspondence, vortices are mapped to charged operators with large spin and we compute their scaling dimensions. Different regimes are identified: phonons, vortex rings, Kelvin waves, and vortex crystals. We also compute correlators with a Noether current insertion in between vortex states. Results for the scaling dimensions of traceless symmetric operators are given in arbitrary spacetime dimensions. * gabriel.cuomo@epfl.ch arXiv:1906.07283v2 [hep-th] 22 Jun 2019 1 IntroductionConformal field theories (CFTs) play a key role in particle and condensed matter physics. As fixed points of the renormalization group flow, they act as landmarks in the space of quantum field theories (QFTs). Through the AdS/CFT correspondence [1,2], they promise to shed light on quantum gravity. They also describe critical points for second order phase transitions. Finally, CFTs are also among the few examples of interacting QFTs where exact results are available without supersymmetry. Recently, the bootstrap program [3,4] achieved much progress in the study of CFTs, both through numerical [5,6] and analytical [7,8,9] techniques.Basic observables in CFTs are correlation functions of local operators in the vacuum. Despite this, sometimes one can make predictions for the CFT data defining the theory studying the dynamics of finite density states [10]. This is a consequence of the state/operator correspondence [11,12], which relates states in radial quantization to local operators with the same quantum numbers. So far, this idea has been mainly applied in the investigation of the superfluid phase in conformal field theories [10,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Indeed superfluids are the most natural candidates to describe states at large internal quantum numbers in CFTs. They admit a simple and universal effective field theory (EFT) description [21,22] which allows the computation of correlators in a perturbative expansion controlled by the charge density. The same strategy was recently applied also in the context of non-relativistic CFTs [23,24,25].As the angular momentum is increased, the superfluid starts rotating and vortices develop [26]. These can be included in the EFT as heavy topological defects [27,28,29]. In [30], this EFT was used to describe operators with large spin and large charge in three dimensional CFTs. In this work, we study the predictions of the vortex EFT for four dimensional CFTs.
We compute the lowest operator dimension ∆(J; D) at large global charge J in the O(2) Wilson-Fisher model in D = 4 − ϵ dimensions, to leading order in both 1/J and ϵ. While the effective field theory approach of [1] could only determine ∆(J; 3) as a series expansion in 1/J up to an undetermined constant in front of each term, this time we try to determine the coefficient in front of J3/2 in the ϵ-expansion. The final result for ∆(J; D) in the (resummed) ϵ-expansion, valid when J ≫ 1/ϵ ≫ 1, turns out to be$$ \Delta \left(J;D\right)=\left[\frac{2\left(D-1\right)}{3\left(D-2\right)}{\left(\frac{9\left(D-2\right)\pi }{5D}\right)}^{\frac{D}{2\left(D-1\right)}}{\left[\frac{5\Gamma \left(\frac{D}{2}\right)}{24{\pi}^2}\right]}^{\frac{1}{D-1}}{\epsilon}^{\frac{D-1}{2\left(D-1\right)}}\right]\times {J}^{\frac{D}{D-1}}+O\left({J}^{\frac{D-2}{D-1}}\right) $$ Δ J D = 2 D − 1 3 D − 2 9 D − 2 π 5 D D 2 D − 1 5 Γ D 2 24 π 2 1 D − 1 ϵ D − 1 2 D − 1 × J D D − 1 + O J D − 2 D − 1 where next-to-leading order onwards were not computed here due to technical cumbersomeness, despite there are no fundamental difficulties. We also compare the result at ϵ = 1,$$ \Delta (J)=0.293\times {J}^{3/2}+\cdots $$ Δ J = 0.293 × J 3 / 2 + ⋯ to the actual data from the Monte-Carlo simulation in three dimensions [2], and the discrepancy of the coefficient 0.293 from the numerics turned out to be 13%. Additionally, we also find a crossover of ∆(J; D) from ∆(J) ∝ $$ {J}^{\frac{D}{D-1}} $$ J D D − 1 to ∆(J) ∝ J, at around J ∼ 1/ϵ, as one decreases J while fixing ϵ (or vice versa), reflecting the fact that there are no interacting fixed-point at ϵ = 0. Based on this behaviour, we propose an interesting double-scaling limit which fixes λ ≡ Jϵ, suitable for probing the region of the crossover. I will give ∆(J; D) to next-to-leading order in perturbation theory, either in 1/λ or in λ, valid when λ ≫ 1 and λ ≪ 1, respectively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.