2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0663-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: The Topographic Design of River Channels for Form-Process Linkages

Abstract: The presentation of Fig. 1e was incorrect in the original publication of the article. The corrected Fig. 1 is given below. The original version of this article was revised.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Manning's n was set to 0.05, representing typical unvegetated coarse-grained (gravel/boulders) surface roughness (Arcement and Schneider, 1989). Typical of published exploratory numerical modeling studies, calibration of bed roughness or eddy viscosity was not possible as the study uses numerical models of theoretical channel archetypes in purely exploratory mode (e.g., Pasternack et al, 2008;Brown et al, 2016;Lane et al, 2018).…”
Section: Channel Variability Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manning's n was set to 0.05, representing typical unvegetated coarse-grained (gravel/boulders) surface roughness (Arcement and Schneider, 1989). Typical of published exploratory numerical modeling studies, calibration of bed roughness or eddy viscosity was not possible as the study uses numerical models of theoretical channel archetypes in purely exploratory mode (e.g., Pasternack et al, 2008;Brown et al, 2016;Lane et al, 2018).…”
Section: Channel Variability Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%