1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.47.4150.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Use of gradient-corrected functionals in total-energy calculations for solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BP functional, in contrast, does not lead to such a peculiar behaviour. Hence, we attribute the sensitivity, in accordance with previous experience [86][87][88], to the specific analytic form of the PW functional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The BP functional, in contrast, does not lead to such a peculiar behaviour. Hence, we attribute the sensitivity, in accordance with previous experience [86][87][88], to the specific analytic form of the PW functional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Equilibrium lattice constants a 0 and bulk moduli B 0 for Nb and for Pd, calculated using the FLAPW method (cf. tables V and VI in reference [87] and table I in [88]).…”
Section: Appendix C Cohesive Properties Of Nb and Pdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(The least empirical of these is due to Perdew and Wang26) Atomization energies of small molecules calculated using a GGA are often an order of magnitude closer to experiment, and often within "chemical accuracy" of a couple of kcal/mol of e x p e h e n t 2 l The systematic reliability of these methods is less well established than that of LDA, and more in doubt when it comes to solids. 27 No GGA-based results are discussed here. But evaluating the performance of this new version of DFT in the context of surface-atom potential energy surfaces is on many surface-scientists' nearterm agendas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%