2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.83.019901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: X-ray studies of interlayer water absorption and mesoporous water transport in a weakly hydrated clay [Phys. Rev. E82, 036315 (2010)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interlayer distance corresponding to this angle, calculated according to Bragg's Law, is 1.2 nm (see peak labeled (a) in Figure 3). This value agrees with that reported in the literature for LiFh with one layer of water intercalated in the stacks in ambient conditions [5].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The interlayer distance corresponding to this angle, calculated according to Bragg's Law, is 1.2 nm (see peak labeled (a) in Figure 3). This value agrees with that reported in the literature for LiFh with one layer of water intercalated in the stacks in ambient conditions [5].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It could therefore be possible that the clay was packed in the sample holder in such a way that traces of water vapor surrounding the clay in the sample cell were transferred into the clay which was subjected to the incident X-ray beam. As humidity transport has been shown to be slow in this sample (days/cm), 14 we expect that it would take some time before a water intercalation front reaches the scattering volume and a pure hydration state is detected on the diffraction patterns.…”
Section: B Nitrogen Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point we do not know whether a transition to a higher intercalation state (two monolayers of intercalant) could take place with CO2, as is commonly observed in this clay for the case of water. [14][15][16][17] The differences in intensity profile between the initial dehydrated peak and the final intercalated peak have several possible explanations. Firstly we clearly observe a more symmetric shape and a smaller full width at half maximum for the intercalation peak compared to the dehydrated peak.…”
Section: A Co2 Intercalationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations