2016
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2016.7738355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error analysis of analytical coarse alignment formulations for stationary SINS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coarse alignment is an analytical process that generates rough estimates of the vehicle initial orientation [6,7]. Due to some weak assumptions on which it is based, namely perfectly stationary conditions and unbiased inertial sensors, the coarse alignment generally fails to comply with the system’s accuracy requirements, and a posterior stochastic filtering and optimal estimation-based procedure becomes necessary [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coarse alignment is an analytical process that generates rough estimates of the vehicle initial orientation [6,7]. Due to some weak assumptions on which it is based, namely perfectly stationary conditions and unbiased inertial sensors, the coarse alignment generally fails to comply with the system’s accuracy requirements, and a posterior stochastic filtering and optimal estimation-based procedure becomes necessary [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Update K ( ) ,̂( ) and P ( ) / −1 : 10: (5,10,5,30,30) in the MSTKF method, (1) is diag (1,10,1,30,30), and (2) is diag (10,1,1,30,30) in the MSTSKF method. The simulation lasts about 600 s and the alignment results of KF, MSTKF, and MSTSKF are discussed and comprehensively evaluated.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field experimental data is collected to evaluate the performance of the proposed MSTSKF method in large initial misalignment angles and mismatch of noise covariance matrix cases. In this experiment, the forgetting factor is 0.95 in both MSTKF method and MSTSKF method, the is diag (5,15,15,30,30) in the MSTKF method, (1) is diag(1,10,1,30,30), and (2) is diag (10,1,1,30,30) in the MSTSKF method.…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the development of SINS, Silva et al derived attitude error formulations for stationary SINS [11]. The static model had a better application in research for its simple structure, but it did not apply to a dynamic base.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%