1968
DOI: 10.1063/1.1656979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Analysis of the Determination of Spin Concentration with the Electron Spin Resonance Method

Abstract: This paper presents a discussion of the errors involved determining the concentration of paramagnetic centers with the electron spin resonance method. The work is based on a theoretical analysis of the relation describing the amplitude of the recorded derivative spectrum. Experimental and computational work has been done on a dual cavity for comparing two samples different in size, shape, and material. Special attention is given to corrections for power saturation, and to the determination of the errors made i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For longer samples, L Å 40 and 50 mm, B). The agreement between theory and experiment is good in all cases and any deviations can be attributed to the pres-optimized values for I pp correspond to the sample center, S c (L/2), being shifted below the physical center of the ence of the sample access holes (17, 24), the compression field effect (5,19), and nonuniformity of both the micro-cavity. wave and the modulation fields (13,17,18) which were not Some of the above experiments were repeated using the included in the theoretical function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For longer samples, L Å 40 and 50 mm, B). The agreement between theory and experiment is good in all cases and any deviations can be attributed to the pres-optimized values for I pp correspond to the sample center, S c (L/2), being shifted below the physical center of the ence of the sample access holes (17, 24), the compression field effect (5,19), and nonuniformity of both the micro-cavity. wave and the modulation fields (13,17,18) which were not Some of the above experiments were repeated using the included in the theoretical function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…cavity (5,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) and serious systematic errors may be in-(3) The sample was inserted at the bottom of the active curred in quantitative EPR spectroscopy if samples with difpart of the cavity, S L (L) å P out , and then moved up to the ferent lengths or internal diameters are compared. These upper boundary of the cavity, S 0 (0) å P in .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations