Thermal Conductivity 14 1976
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-3751-3_64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Analysis of the Flash Thermal Diffusivity Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, more numerate individuals are less susceptible to framing effects and draw stronger and more precise affective meaning from numbers and comparisons using numbers. The confound of numeracy may explain why more intelligent (or educated) individuals often display lower discount rates when decisions require complex calculations to compare subtly different delays or reward amounts (for example, de Wit et al 2007;Dohmen et al, 2007) but does not shed light on why smarter individuals also have lower discount rates when choosing between relatively simple cash sums (Funder and Block 1989) and between non-cash rewards (such as smaller vs. larger candy bars in Mischel and Metzner 1962) 53 . A meta-analysis by Shamosh and Gray 2007 Here the line between preference and constraint blurs -is this individual's behavior best explained as a constraint on cognition or a preference?…”
Section: A Time Discountingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, more numerate individuals are less susceptible to framing effects and draw stronger and more precise affective meaning from numbers and comparisons using numbers. The confound of numeracy may explain why more intelligent (or educated) individuals often display lower discount rates when decisions require complex calculations to compare subtly different delays or reward amounts (for example, de Wit et al 2007;Dohmen et al, 2007) but does not shed light on why smarter individuals also have lower discount rates when choosing between relatively simple cash sums (Funder and Block 1989) and between non-cash rewards (such as smaller vs. larger candy bars in Mischel and Metzner 1962) 53 . A meta-analysis by Shamosh and Gray 2007 Here the line between preference and constraint blurs -is this individual's behavior best explained as a constraint on cognition or a preference?…”
Section: A Time Discountingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This non-randomly selection of sample can lead to biased estimations if this selection is correlated with the dependent variable, violent dissent in this study. 24 This is a fundamental problem with conflict research using observational data to study movement tactics and their outcomes, and there is no easy solution to address this problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clark and Taylor [SI proposed a new algorithm for analyzing the radiation heat losses from the temperature vs. time plot before the maximum temperature had been reached. Koski [6] and Heckman [7] incorporated a parameter, L, for heat loss from the front to the rear of the sample for each condition of Clark and Taylor as well as Cowan's method.…”
Section: Operating Software and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%