2012
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Awareness and Salience Processing in the Oddball Task: Shared Neural Mechanisms

Abstract: A body of work suggests similarities in the way we become aware of an error and process motivationally salient events. Yet, evidence for a shared neural mechanism has not been provided. A within subject investigation of the brain regions involved in error awareness and salience processing has not been reported. While the neural response to motivationally salient events is classically studied during target detection after longer target-to-target intervals in an oddball task and engages a widespread insula-thala… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(130 reference statements)
5
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, recent work indicates that anterior insula serves as a hub in a global salience network (with the amygdalae and other structures as nodes; Harsay et al, 2012; Seeley et al, 2007), and is not thought to signal either expected value or signed prediction errors. Thus, while neural responses in anterior insula, the amygdalae, and parietal cortices are often evoked by salient stimuli with incentive value, these responses are more likely to reflect their salience than their incentive value.…”
Section: Identifying a Relationship Between Ev And Avolition: Consimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, recent work indicates that anterior insula serves as a hub in a global salience network (with the amygdalae and other structures as nodes; Harsay et al, 2012; Seeley et al, 2007), and is not thought to signal either expected value or signed prediction errors. Thus, while neural responses in anterior insula, the amygdalae, and parietal cortices are often evoked by salient stimuli with incentive value, these responses are more likely to reflect their salience than their incentive value.…”
Section: Identifying a Relationship Between Ev And Avolition: Consimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This component has reliably been used to index cognitive control, novelty, and expectancy violation (for a review, see Folstein & Petten, 2008). The N2 is consistently localized to the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) (Hajcak, Moser, Yeung, & Simons, 2005), a region implicated in conflict monitoring (Botvinick, Cohen, & Carter, 2004) and saliency processing (Harsay, Spaan, Wijnen, & Ridderinkhof, 2012). Importantly, N2 also reflects the affective evaluation and motivational significance of negative outcomes (Hajcak, Moser, et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the thalamus, another region that is reportedly critical for this set of PCE-affected functions, has received relatively little attention. Numerous reports support a role for the thalamus and thalamocortical connectivity in 1) arousal regulation (Paus et al, 1997) that is closely related to the performance of sustained attention (Paus et al, 1997; Sarter et al, 2001), 2) saliency detection and processing (Ding et al, 2010), especially in terms of salient error monitoring (Harsay et al, 2012; Li et al, 2008; Zhang et al, 2014), and 3) working memory through the contribution from the mediodorsal nucleus (Watanabe and Funahashi, 2012). Therefore, abnormal thalamocortical connectivity could also contribute to the reported PCE-related functional deficits and deserves further attention as a novel target for better understanding of the neural correlates of PCE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%