2019
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2018.2843363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Backprojection Algorithms for Non-Line-of-Sight Imaging

Abstract: Recent advances in computer vision and inverse light transport theory have resulted in several non-line-of-sight imaging techniques. These techniques use photon time-of-flight information encoded in light after multiple, diffuse reflections to reconstruct a three-dimensional scene. In this paper, we propose and describe two iterative backprojection algorithms, the additive error backprojection (AEB) and multiplicative error backprojection (MEB), whose goal is to improve the reconstruction of the scene under in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fur-thermore the complete 3D retrieval of the hidden scene often requires prohibitive time resources with the 3D imaging of a moving object, although progress is being made to reduce the acquisition and reconstruction times [6,19], with the goal of reaching second or even sub-second times. Additionally, the spatial resolution of the retrieval can be improved by using iterative backprojection algorithms that however, typically require longer computational times [20,21]. Another rapidly evolving imaging technique is based on so-called single-pixel cameras [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fur-thermore the complete 3D retrieval of the hidden scene often requires prohibitive time resources with the 3D imaging of a moving object, although progress is being made to reduce the acquisition and reconstruction times [6,19], with the goal of reaching second or even sub-second times. Additionally, the spatial resolution of the retrieval can be improved by using iterative backprojection algorithms that however, typically require longer computational times [20,21]. Another rapidly evolving imaging technique is based on so-called single-pixel cameras [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a dataset is not suitable for implementing the virtual point light source described in Eq. (5). Instead, we can model an illumination wavefront that is focused on x v :…”
Section: Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After theoretical exploration of the problem 1,2 , the first experimental demonstration of NLOS imaging used a filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithm 3,4 similar to inverse methods used in computed tomography. Modified FBP algorithms such as error backprojection 5 and Laplacian of Gaussian (LOG) FBP 6 can provide high quality reconstructions, but have a high computational complexity and take minutes to hours to execute on a desktop computer. Buttafava et al 7 show that it is possible to use a gated Single-Photon Avalanche Diode (SPAD) for NLOS imaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, unlike linear backprojection used in standard emission or absorption tomography, ellipsoidal backprojection is not the adjoint of a physically motivated forward light transport operator. This necessitates heavy heuristic filtering [Manna et al 2018], and the reconstructed shapes are typically flat and low in detail. On the other hand, algorithms based on ellipsoidal backprojection generally have much shorter runtimes than our approach, since they don't require a global optimization scheme.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%