1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1004039431669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Bounds for Asymptotic Expansion of the Conditional Variance of the Scale Mixtures of the Multivariate Normal Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the multi‐variate t distribution is a scale mixture of normal distributions as in (11) for a particular choice of A , it is desirable to know if the exact likelihood equations and analogue of (8) and (18) can be derived for other scale mixtures of normals. In this direction, all we know at this time (Cambanis et al ., 2000) is that However, the function g n ( X )= E ( A | X ) is much harder to analyse (Fotopoulos and He, 1999) than the function g n , ν ( X ) appearing as the multiplier in (8). More research is needed to understand the dependence of g n ( X ) on n and the possibility of finding GARCH‐type models for the prediction error variance of other scale mixtures of normal random vectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the multi‐variate t distribution is a scale mixture of normal distributions as in (11) for a particular choice of A , it is desirable to know if the exact likelihood equations and analogue of (8) and (18) can be derived for other scale mixtures of normals. In this direction, all we know at this time (Cambanis et al ., 2000) is that However, the function g n ( X )= E ( A | X ) is much harder to analyse (Fotopoulos and He, 1999) than the function g n , ν ( X ) appearing as the multiplier in (8). More research is needed to understand the dependence of g n ( X ) on n and the possibility of finding GARCH‐type models for the prediction error variance of other scale mixtures of normal random vectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%