2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.92.060301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error compensation of single-qubit gates in a surface-electrode ion trap using composite pulses

Abstract: The fidelity of laser-driven quantum logic operations on trapped ion qubits tend to be lower than microwavedriven logic operations due to the difficulty of stabilizing the driving fields at the ion location. Through stabilization of the driving optical fields and use of composite pulse sequences, we demonstrate high-fidelity single-qubit gates for the hyperfine qubit of a 171 Yb + ion trapped in a microfabricated surface-electrode ion trap. Gate error is characterized using a randomized benchmarking protocol a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,110 These small error-correcting procedures only require 17-25 total ions per logical qubit to generate fault-tolerant circuits that can have error thresholds near 10 − 3 . This error rate is compatible with the best current ion trap gates and measurements 20,25,26,[64][65][66] , and the whole procedure can easily fit within a single ELU. These small codes are only guaranteed to correct single errors, so the total number of reliable, but non-universal, operations on many logical qubits will scale as the error threshold divided by the square of the physical error per operation.…”
Section: Topology Of Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8,110 These small error-correcting procedures only require 17-25 total ions per logical qubit to generate fault-tolerant circuits that can have error thresholds near 10 − 3 . This error rate is compatible with the best current ion trap gates and measurements 20,25,26,[64][65][66] , and the whole procedure can easily fit within a single ELU. These small codes are only guaranteed to correct single errors, so the total number of reliable, but non-universal, operations on many logical qubits will scale as the error threshold divided by the square of the physical error per operation.…”
Section: Topology Of Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…61 The design and fabrication of complex surface traps using silicon microfabrication processes has now matured, with examples of the Sandia high-optical access (HOA) trap 62 and the GTRI/Honeywell ball-grid array (BGA) trap 63 shown in Figure 3. Recent experiments have demonstrated high-performance qubit measurement 20 and single-qubit quantum gates [64][65][66] in such microfabricated surface traps that outperform conventional manually assembled macroscopic traps. The ability to design and simulate the electromagnetic trapping parameters prior to fabrication provides an attractive path to developing complex trap structures that are both repeatable and produced with high yield.…”
Section: Integration Technologies For Trapped Ion Quantum Computersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of undesired frequency components in square-shaped pulses has previously been reduced by employing amplitude-shaped pulses with a smooth rising and falling slope [13][14][15]. Furthermore, composite pulses, first developed in the context of nuclear magnetic resonance [16][17][18], are used in trapped ion systems to implement complex algorithms [19,20] or operations that are less sensitive to variations of the experimental parameters [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, information will be stored in the hyperfine 'clock' states of 171 Yb + . While single-qubit operations in this system have displayed error rates below the surface code pseudothreshold [54,55] reported from Tomita and Svore [28], two-qubit gate fidelities are limited by a number of factors including spontaneous Raman scattering during gates and residual entanglement between the internal state and the motional modes of the ion. Compensation pulses have been developed with a predicted error rate due to scattering of 10 −4 [56] and control sequences have been implemented exhibiting single-and two-qubit gate fidelities of 99.9% using the hyperfine ground states of trapped 9 Be + [52] and 43 Ca + [51] ions, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%