2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2004.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error correction of a predictive ocean wave model using local model approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean value µ WF (t) is, as proposed by [16], set equal to 0. The time-dependent uncertainty about weather forecast standard deviation σ WF (t) is chosen based on available forecast studies (wind: [17,18]; significant wave height [19][20][21]). Additionally an autocorrelation function is considered here in order to represent correlation between the successively following wind speeds and significant wave height values and preventing large variations, which is physically unrealistic, among values behind each other.…”
Section: Imperfect Weather Forecastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean value µ WF (t) is, as proposed by [16], set equal to 0. The time-dependent uncertainty about weather forecast standard deviation σ WF (t) is chosen based on available forecast studies (wind: [17,18]; significant wave height [19][20][21]). Additionally an autocorrelation function is considered here in order to represent correlation between the successively following wind speeds and significant wave height values and preventing large variations, which is physically unrealistic, among values behind each other.…”
Section: Imperfect Weather Forecastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this paper, an alternate inverse approach based on genetic algorithm (GA) is employed, which has demonstrated significant improvements over the standard approach (see, e.g. References [18,19,[22][23][24]). …”
Section: Y Sun Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the resulting overall model can be highly nonlinear since each of these linear approximations is made within separate neighbourhoods [15]. This forecasting procedure has been successfully applied directly to measured time series [11] as well as to time series of deterministic model errors [10] computed as residuals between simulation outputs and measurements at different sampling times. The second approach is desirable when an important contribution to describe the system dynamics can come from physically based numerical models.…”
Section: Error Correction Using Llmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these approaches, error correction at observation points can be undertaken by predicting errors using records of past residuals between model results and actual measurements. Error forecasting can be carried out using, for example, local linear models (LLMs) in real-time applications [10,11]. However, as it is not always sufficient to correct numerical models only at the points where observations are available, distribution of the predicted error from observation points over the remainder of the computational domain is often necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%