2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-008-0139-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error estimates for a mixed finite element discretization of some degenerate parabolic equations

Abstract: We consider a numerical scheme for a class of degenerate parabolic equations, including both slow and fast diffusion cases. A particular example in this sense is the Richards equation modeling the flow in porous media. The numerical scheme is based on the mixed finite element method (MFEM) in space, and is of one ) to a more general framework, by allowing for both types of degeneracies. We derive error estimates in terms of the discretization parameters and show the convergence of the scheme. The features of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Galerkin finite elements were used in [2,3,9,22,24,32], often together with mass lumping to ensure a maximum principle [8]. Locally mass conservative schemes for Richards' equation were proposed and analysed in [10,11] (finite volumes), in [16] (multipoint flux approximation) or [4,5,26,29,34,35] (mixed finite element method). The analysis is performed mostly by using the Kirchhoff transformation (which combines the two main non-linearities in one) [1,4,26,28,34] or, alternatively, by restricting the generality, e.g.…”
Section: ∂ T θ(ψ ) − ∇ · (K(θ(ψ ))∇(ψmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Galerkin finite elements were used in [2,3,9,22,24,32], often together with mass lumping to ensure a maximum principle [8]. Locally mass conservative schemes for Richards' equation were proposed and analysed in [10,11] (finite volumes), in [16] (multipoint flux approximation) or [4,5,26,29,34,35] (mixed finite element method). The analysis is performed mostly by using the Kirchhoff transformation (which combines the two main non-linearities in one) [1,4,26,28,34] or, alternatively, by restricting the generality, e.g.…”
Section: ∂ T θ(ψ ) − ∇ · (K(θ(ψ ))∇(ψmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the convergence order is still at least 2. This is in spite of the theoretical estimates of order τ + h 2 , which are obtained even in a weaker norm, but for the Richards equation in the saturated/unsaturated flow regime (see [5,31,33,37]). This improved convergence for the flow leads to better results for the solute transport, similar to the theoretical estimates in Theorem 4.5.…”
Section: Numericalmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The regularity assumption on ∂ t Θ is given u p in [31], resulting in a reduction of the convergence order to τ + h 2 . A more general situation is considered in [33], where only Hölder continuity is assumed for Θ(·). In this case the convergence result applies to all flow regimes.…”
Section: Notations and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical schemes are described in more detail in [8] and [7], respectively. For other numerical approaches and detailed numerical analysis we refer to [12] and the references therein. For the inverted hysteresis relation (1.6), we use a regularized function Ψ δ γ,τ : R → R, 1) where δ > 0 is a regularizing parameter.…”
Section: Calculations Of Gravity Driven Wetting Frontsmentioning
confidence: 99%