2011
DOI: 10.1137/100801731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Estimates of Stochastic Optimal Neumann Boundary Control Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main ways of measuring this spatial-stochastic quantity: the expected value of spatial mismatch(see e.g. [8,7] more ref's) and the spatial mismatch of averages of the statistical quantities of interest. More precisely, we consider the minimization cost functionals of the type…”
Section: A Generalized Methodology For the Solution Of Stochastic Idementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are two main ways of measuring this spatial-stochastic quantity: the expected value of spatial mismatch(see e.g. [8,7] more ref's) and the spatial mismatch of averages of the statistical quantities of interest. More precisely, we consider the minimization cost functionals of the type…”
Section: A Generalized Methodology For the Solution Of Stochastic Idementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,14,1,2,15,10,9,7]) one can prove that the problem (0.10)-(0.3) has a unique optimal pair that is characterized by a maximum principle type result.…”
Section: A Generalized Methodology For the Solution Of Stochastic Idementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tables and figures for computational results, for simplicity, we use DP = ∑ N n=1 p n , where p n is the maximum degree of polynomials in a y n -direction and DOF as the number DP (DOF ) Relative Error for u Relative Error for ξ Relative Error for f 1 (2) 1.198032987982e-01 1.787953125199e-01 1.720684070324e-01 3 (4) 9.562740236029e-03 1.524223854302e-02 1.341233756062e-02 5 (6) 5.570898785792e-04 1.057333186124e-03 8.615989678717e-04 7 (8) 2.795461789913e-05 6.309221819675e-05 4.901139558725e-05 9 (10) 1.286833647831e-06 3.391536066446e-06 2.567358708683e-06 11 (12) 4.560494644988e-08 1.362462543327e-07 1.019093421438e-07 (2) 9.401289567930e-02 1.987307188342e-01 1.752373609462e-01 3 (6) 1.021973093216e-02 2.469886703133e-02 1.951724713049e-02 5 (12) 1.005212637175e-03 3.036986195881e-03 2.380145213483e-03 7 (20) 9.899411004937e-05 3.609536395869e-04 2.891208795498e-04 9 (30) 9.451679011477e-06 3.927211535465e-05 3.149626856263e-05 11 (42) 3.335005157516e-07 2.710535612892e-06 2.420352397715e-06 of degrees of freedom of the discretization with respect to the random parameter space. For instance, if we use p = (p 1 , p 2 ) = (5, 4), then DP = 9 and DOF = 30.…”
Section: Numerical Setting In Our Numerical Experiments We Use Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would like to mention here that ∇ means differentiation with respect to x ∈ D only. To analyze our optimal control problem using the h × p version approach, we use the Karhunan-Loéve (KL) expansion [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], transform stochastic PDEs to deterministic high dimensional PDEs, and present a priori error estimates of the h × p version of the SGFEM to the transformed model equation. After that, by using the method of Lagrange multipliers, we derive the optimality system of equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error estimates of stochastic optimal Neumann boundary control problems [9] We study mathematically and computationally optimal control problems for stochastic partial differential equations with Neumann boundary conditions. The control objective is to minimize the expectation of a cost functional, and the control is of the deterministic, boundary-value type.…”
Section: Brief Descriptions Of Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%