2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error identification of measurement software based on digital twin of gear measuring center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chunxia L et al [9] designed a compensation algorithm for contact measurement software, built a digital twin model (DTGMC) based on gear measurement center, and used it as an evaluation platform. However, without proper test equipment, the software cannot match the errors found in real experiments.…”
Section: 2 State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chunxia L et al [9] designed a compensation algorithm for contact measurement software, built a digital twin model (DTGMC) based on gear measurement center, and used it as an evaluation platform. However, without proper test equipment, the software cannot match the errors found in real experiments.…”
Section: 2 State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the actual detection process, the accuracy will be affected by the geometric error of the detection equipment itself, the type of probe, and the corresponding data 2 of 14 compensation method [7,8]. Given this, many scholars have completed lots of research on the detection method of face gear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach involves creating a digital twin of the gear measurement center and compensating for errors based on the error model, which can enhance the measurement accuracy to a certain extent. For example, Lu 14 built the digital twin of a gear measuring center (DTGMC) as an evaluation platform for various measurement software. It can effectively identify various errors, providing a new idea for the independent evaluation of measurement software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%