2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02145.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error-Monitoring Ability Predicts Daily Stress Regulation

Abstract: This study examined whether individual differences in error-related self-regulation predict emotion regulation in daily life, as suggested by a common-systems view of cognitive and emotional self-regulation. Participants (N= 47) completed a Stroop task, from which error-related brain potentials and behavioral measures of error correction were computed. Participants subsequently reported on daily stressors and anxiety over a 2-week period. As predicted by the common-systems view, a physiological marker of error… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
84
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…was presented for 2000 ms prior to the 150 ms blank delay. By using these procedures, we could ensure that an error had been consciously registered, thus focusing the task on reactivity to error feedback rather than less easily discernable individual differences in awareness of having made an error (Compton et al, 2008;Wilkowski & Robinson, 2008a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was presented for 2000 ms prior to the 150 ms blank delay. By using these procedures, we could ensure that an error had been consciously registered, thus focusing the task on reactivity to error feedback rather than less easily discernable individual differences in awareness of having made an error (Compton et al, 2008;Wilkowski & Robinson, 2008a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to endogenous triggers, compromised monitoring may also affect the user's insight into their own drug urges or stresslevels. A recent study has linked an electrophysiological marker of error processing (the error-related negativity) to success over 2 weeks in monitoring and regulating one's stress levels (Compton et al 2008). Not until the user can detect that the craving response (or its antecedents) has begun can he or she attempt to control it.…”
Section: Insula Cognition and Cravingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such stressors were selected from the College Inventory of Daily Stressors (Kohn, Lafreniere, & Gurevich, 1990) and were chosen because they are frequent to everyday life and consequential in such protocols (e.g., Compton et al, 2008). Alpha for this scale was .85.…”
Section: Experience-sampled Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%