1976
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(76)90092-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error propagation by the Monte Carlo method in geochemical calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These procedures introduced a wide range of potential error sources into the CH 4 content measurements. Thus, the uncertainties in the total CH 4 content were determined by Monte Carlo simulations assuming uniform uncertainty distributions for all parameters including measurement uncertainty, head space volume, sample volume, ambient temperature, and pressure (e.g., Anderson, 1976).…”
Section: Sampling Methane Concentrations In Lake Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These procedures introduced a wide range of potential error sources into the CH 4 content measurements. Thus, the uncertainties in the total CH 4 content were determined by Monte Carlo simulations assuming uniform uncertainty distributions for all parameters including measurement uncertainty, head space volume, sample volume, ambient temperature, and pressure (e.g., Anderson, 1976).…”
Section: Sampling Methane Concentrations In Lake Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcification rates were determined using the slope of the normalized amount of carbonate precipitated. The errors for alkalinity measurements and buoyant weights were propagated using the Monte Carlo method to determine the total standard deviation of calcification rates (~4.5 % RSD; Anderson, 1976 Carbonate dissociation constants used in the calculation were from Mehrbach et al (1973) refitted by Dickson and Millero (1987). Throughout the experiment, corals were kept on a 12hr/12hr light/dark cycle (average light intensity of 257 ± 39 µmol m -2 sec -1 ) and fed a mixture of 100-150 µm and <100 µm larval AP100 diet (Ziegler) twice weekly.…”
Section: Supplementarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These estimations (Table 3) were an upper limit since the other DFe fluxes (advection and diffusion) were not taken into account. Errors were estimated by a Monte Carlo routine (Anderson, 1976). Residence times ranged from 1778 (21.1-16.1 N) to 28716 d (15.9-10.6 N).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%