2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error propagation in relative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction quantification models: The balance between accuracy and precision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transcriptional expressions of the selected target genes (fadD1, fadD2, fadA, fabH1, fabG, rhlA, and rhlB) were evaluated by the quantification of mRNA transcripts as described previously (22). Briefly, 500-l samples were taken from each treatment at 8,20,24,30, and 48 h, mixed with 1 ml of RNAprotect bacterial reagent (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and stored at Ϫ20°C. RNA was extracted using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) from extraction volumes that were standardized at a cell number of 1 ϫ 10 9 CFU.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transcriptional expressions of the selected target genes (fadD1, fadD2, fadA, fabH1, fabG, rhlA, and rhlB) were evaluated by the quantification of mRNA transcripts as described previously (22). Briefly, 500-l samples were taken from each treatment at 8,20,24,30, and 48 h, mixed with 1 ml of RNAprotect bacterial reagent (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and stored at Ϫ20°C. RNA was extracted using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) from extraction volumes that were standardized at a cell number of 1 ϫ 10 9 CFU.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative expression ratio (RER) of each target gene (T) was calculated from control (glucose) and treatment (C 18 or C 18 -d 35 ) C T values of the target and two reference (R1 and R2) genes at each growth stage using the Nordgård model (equation 1) (24). An effect on gene expression was considered significant when the corresponding ratios were Ͼ2 or Ͻ0.5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplifi cation curves were analyzed using LinReg software v12.7 (Ramakers et al, 2003) to correct for baseline values that produce much variability in amplifi cation effi ciency (Ruijter et al, 2009). The amplifi cation effi ciency was assumed to be the same for all samples per amplicon and PCR run, as the observed variability has been shown to refl ect random error rather than a true variation (Nordgard et al, 2006). The relative gene expression (RGE) was determined by normalizing the effi ciency-corrected expression levels of the target genes to that of 18S rRNA, a commonly-used reference gene in multiple studies involving cartilage and meniscus (Upton et al, 2003;Hofstaetter et al, 2004;Valiyaveettil et al, 2005;Zielinska et al, 2009).…”
Section: Me Levenston Et Al Discrimination Of Meniscal Cell Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primer sequences can be found in the supplement (Supplemental Table 3). Standard deviation for relative fold changes was calculated using error propagation (Nordgård et al 2006).…”
Section: Rna Extraction and Rt-qpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%