1992
DOI: 10.1086/133096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors Associated with Fitting Gaussian Profiles to Noisy Emission-Line Spectra

Abstract: Landman et al. developed prescriptions to predict profile fitting errors for Gaussian emission lines perturbed by white noise. We show that their scaling laws can be generalized to more complicated signal-dependent "noise models" of common astronomical detector systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 we indicate, for all performed fits, the error on the velocity dispersion ∆v FWHM and on radial velocity ∆v LOS as a function of the lines S/N. On average our uncertainties on v FWHM and v LOS follow the scaling laws expected for fitting Gaussian profiles to noisy emission-line spectra Landman et al 1982;Lenz & Ayres 1992). For reference, at our minimum S /N = 6 we have typical errors of ∆v FWHM ≈ 30 km s −1 and ∆v LOS ≈ 10 km s −1 , and at the median (mean) S/N of our data -S /N median = 22 (S /N mean = 50), we obtain ∆v FWHM ≈ 7 km s −1 (≈3 km s −1 ) and ∆v LOS ≈ 3 km s −1 (≈1 km s −1 ).…”
Section: Hα Velocity Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…4 we indicate, for all performed fits, the error on the velocity dispersion ∆v FWHM and on radial velocity ∆v LOS as a function of the lines S/N. On average our uncertainties on v FWHM and v LOS follow the scaling laws expected for fitting Gaussian profiles to noisy emission-line spectra Landman et al 1982;Lenz & Ayres 1992). For reference, at our minimum S /N = 6 we have typical errors of ∆v FWHM ≈ 30 km s −1 and ∆v LOS ≈ 10 km s −1 , and at the median (mean) S/N of our data -S /N median = 22 (S /N mean = 50), we obtain ∆v FWHM ≈ 7 km s −1 (≈3 km s −1 ) and ∆v LOS ≈ 3 km s −1 (≈1 km s −1 ).…”
Section: Hα Velocity Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Lenz & Ayres (1992) found this relation to be applicable independent of the noise model assumed, whether pure poissonian or with such deviations from poissonian as are found in typical astronomical instruments.…”
Section: Estimation Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The ratio of the peak flux of each line to the RMS of the residuals at the wavelength of the line is then taken to be the signal to noise ratio at the centre of the line. The code then applies the empirical relation described by Lenz & Ayres (1992) for estimating the uncertainty on a line fit based on the signal to noise ratio at the centre of a line. The relation is…”
Section: Estimation Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 In the subsequent fits, the line FWHMs were fixed at these values. Line features were fitted as Gaussians, with central wavelength and peak amplitude allowed to vary; errors were determined using the formula- tions of Lenz & Ayres (1992). We used the solar photospheric abundances of Grevesse & Sauval (1998.…”
Section: Determining Abundances and The Emission Measure Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%