2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2006.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors due to magnetic effects in 1kg primary mass comparators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vertical magnetic flux density, other than the Earth's, at the mass pan could be reduced to about 50 µT with a vertical gradient of about 1 mT m −1 , which is sufficiently low. For an estimation of the error forces exerted, one can use the approach shown in [15]. Another measure to increase the validity of the model and the stray flux problem is to design a closed magnet system.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Results And Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical magnetic flux density, other than the Earth's, at the mass pan could be reduced to about 50 µT with a vertical gradient of about 1 mT m −1 , which is sufficiently low. For an estimation of the error forces exerted, one can use the approach shown in [15]. Another measure to increase the validity of the model and the stray flux problem is to design a closed magnet system.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Results And Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for example, an OIML class E 2 10 g stainless steel mass placed on the KIBB-g1 mass pan would experience an additional force equivalent to a 12 mg mass due to the magnetic susceptibility of the material. This effect can be characterized by two magnetic force terms from [16]:…”
Section: Magneticmentioning
confidence: 99%