2017
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.94532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors in data interpretation from genetic variation of human analytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies will shed light on the effector functions of the various IgG allotypes and the potential implications in susceptibility to infectious diseases or translation to antibody-based therapeutics. Interestingly, reactivity of monoclonal or polyclonal anti-IgG antibodies with all IgG allotypes indicated that some monoclonal antibodies, either subclass- or isotype-specific do not recognize all allotypic variants, a phenomenon described as ‘serological blind spots’ [100,101]. In addition, subclass-specific polyclonal anti-IgG were found to react with isoallotypic variants of another subclass, which could lead to misinterpretation of IgG subclass responses and can be of great importance, not only for scientific interpretations of immune responses, but also for critical diagnostic conclusion that leads to life-and-death decisions for patients [100].…”
Section: Igg Allotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies will shed light on the effector functions of the various IgG allotypes and the potential implications in susceptibility to infectious diseases or translation to antibody-based therapeutics. Interestingly, reactivity of monoclonal or polyclonal anti-IgG antibodies with all IgG allotypes indicated that some monoclonal antibodies, either subclass- or isotype-specific do not recognize all allotypic variants, a phenomenon described as ‘serological blind spots’ [100,101]. In addition, subclass-specific polyclonal anti-IgG were found to react with isoallotypic variants of another subclass, which could lead to misinterpretation of IgG subclass responses and can be of great importance, not only for scientific interpretations of immune responses, but also for critical diagnostic conclusion that leads to life-and-death decisions for patients [100].…”
Section: Igg Allotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are clear benefits in the use of monoclonal AHG including issues of production, reagent consistency, and avoiding the manipulation of animals. However, as pointed out previously (and in the current report), the risk of using monoclonal AHG is nonreactivity with genetic IgG variants found in particular patient populations . A “virtual polyclonal” reagent can be generated by blending monoclonals with specificity against different epitopes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the commonly available monoclonal anti-IgG3 (clone HP6050) has a blind spot for IgG3-04 20. To the best of our knowledge, no data have been published that would allow a determination of the exact frequency of IgG3-04 heterogeneity or homogeneity in human populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, once one takes into account the 29 known variants, the available polyclonal antisera cross react with inappropriate variants in incorrect subclasses 20. Conversely, monoclonal reagents are more specific; however, available anti-IgG3 reagents have a blind-spot for the IgG3-04 variant, creating a diagnostic problem in the characterisation of any individual whose genome encodes IgG3-04 20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%