2012
DOI: 10.3390/ijms131115420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors in the Calculation of 27Al Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Chemical Shifts

Abstract: Computational chemistry is an important tool for signal assignment of 27Al nuclear magnetic resonance spectra in order to elucidate the species of aluminum(III) in aqueous solutions. The accuracy of the popular theoretical models for computing the 27Al chemical shifts was evaluated by comparing the calculated and experimental chemical shifts in more than one hundred aluminum(III) complexes. In order to differentiate the error due to the chemical shielding tensor calculation from that due to the inadequacy of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the basis set with the B3LYP functional does not significantly change the chemical shifts. However, slightly better agreement with experiment is obtained with the mPW1PW91 functional with a larger basis set. , We note that calculating 27 Al chemical shifts is challenging for modern DFT methods, although the errors herein are somewhat larger than what is typically observed for 27 Al species. We also computed the 1 J ( 27 Al, 13 C) coupling constants for AlPh 4 – .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasing the basis set with the B3LYP functional does not significantly change the chemical shifts. However, slightly better agreement with experiment is obtained with the mPW1PW91 functional with a larger basis set. , We note that calculating 27 Al chemical shifts is challenging for modern DFT methods, although the errors herein are somewhat larger than what is typically observed for 27 Al species. We also computed the 1 J ( 27 Al, 13 C) coupling constants for AlPh 4 – .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…However, slightly better agreement with experiment is obtained with the mPW1PW91 functional with a larger basis set. 17,18 We note that calculating 27 Al chemical shifts is challenging for modern DFT methods, 19 although the errors . The computed value using mPWPW91/ 6-31+G(d,p) is 74.9 Hz (while the measured value from our experiments was 96.0 Hz), comparable to the computed value for Al(t-Bu) 3 of 76.3 Hz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S24 † ) whatever C 5 or C 6 sugar nature. 45 One may therefore deduce, from those NMR data, that stronger interactions occur between organic molecules (BSST) and aluminates rather than silicates (step 3). Those evolving surfactant-like BSST molecules may interfere in the zeolite crystallisation process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The calculation of 27 Al NMR shielding in the aluminate anion has been studied previously using HF, MP2 and DFT levels of theory. [8][9][10][11] In this work, the performance of a given QM method to yield reliable NMR data was assessed by comparing calculated chemical shifts of 27 11,12 Despite these studies, a critical assessment of NMR spectroscopy data from the perspective of absolute shielding computations is still necessary to advance our understanding of error cancellations. This assessment will allow theoretical chemical shifts to be confidently compared with experimental data, and will demonstrate the potential for chemical models to predict, and account for, the significant interactions that influence experimental NMR observables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%