2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In evaluating the ECG-C interpretation of the cardiac rhythm, the ECG-C demonstrated an overall accuracy of 88.0%. 5 Sinus rhythm was correctly interpreted in 95.0% of the ECGs with this rhythm. However, nonsinus rhythms were correctly interpreted with an accuracy of only 54%.…”
Section: Article See P 76mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In evaluating the ECG-C interpretation of the cardiac rhythm, the ECG-C demonstrated an overall accuracy of 88.0%. 5 Sinus rhythm was correctly interpreted in 95.0% of the ECGs with this rhythm. However, nonsinus rhythms were correctly interpreted with an accuracy of only 54%.…”
Section: Article See P 76mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[4][5][6][7] A large international study compared the performance of 9 ECG-C programs with that of cardiologists in interpreting ECGs in clinically validated cases of various cardiac disorders. 4 The percentage of ECGs correctly classified by the ECG-C was lower than that for the cardiologists.…”
Section: Article See P 76mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, ECG interpretation software is built into many modern ECG systems and contains algorithms to assess reliably the cardiac rhythm and measure the heart rate and PR, QRS, and QT intervals. 5 These metrics provide important insight into autonomic function, atrioventricular conduction, ventricular depolarization, and repolarization. In communitybased elderly participants with early CKD, ECG measures were independently associated with all-cause mortality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those annotations were then used as a "golden standard" upon which the computer algorithms were validated for each pair of ECG sequences [10]. A similar approach was used by Shah and Rubin in their study of errors in the computerized ECG interpretation, where two cardiology experts interpreted the tracings recorded [11].…”
Section: Comparing Ecg Recordings From a Variety Of Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore a similar evaluation should be performed as a randomized control study involving more hospitals and cardiologists. Furthermore, several different Holter recorders should be considered, as there might be limited accuracy in the automatic ECG interpretations as described by Shah and Rubin [11]. It would be preferable if ECG recordings from the two different systems could be exported to a standardized format in which a third party arrhythmia detection software could be able to compare actual findings from the two recording systems, as this would be an independent evaluation to be manually confirmed by the cardiologists.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%