1983
DOI: 10.1136/thx.38.6.468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors in the measurement of total lung capacity in chronic obstructive lung disease.

Abstract: ABSTRAcr The standard plethysmographic method of measuring total lung capacity (TLC) has been reported to result in spuriously high estimates in patients with severe airway obstruction. The helium-dilution method is known to underestimate TLC in the same patients. To determine the magnitude of these possible errors we measured TLC by four methods in 20 patients with varying degrees of chronic obstructive lung disease and in 11 normal subjects. TLC was measured by (1) helium dilution (TLCHe); (2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current findings do not define to what extent the small degree of measured discrepancy between TLC RB and TLC pleth represents inability of plethysmography to reflect regions of lung with long time constants (Brown et al 1998), or overestimation of thoracic gas volume using mouth occlusion pressure changes in the presence of airflow obstruction (Brown et al 1978; Rodenstein et al 1982a; Brown et al 1984). The current data provide documentation to the clinician that TLC pleth reflects to a great extent available gas dilutional thoracic volume even in patients with severe emphysema by pulmonary function and GOLD staging criteria (Rodenstein et al 1982a; Pare et al 1983; Andersson et al 1988). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The current findings do not define to what extent the small degree of measured discrepancy between TLC RB and TLC pleth represents inability of plethysmography to reflect regions of lung with long time constants (Brown et al 1998), or overestimation of thoracic gas volume using mouth occlusion pressure changes in the presence of airflow obstruction (Brown et al 1978; Rodenstein et al 1982a; Brown et al 1984). The current data provide documentation to the clinician that TLC pleth reflects to a great extent available gas dilutional thoracic volume even in patients with severe emphysema by pulmonary function and GOLD staging criteria (Rodenstein et al 1982a; Pare et al 1983; Andersson et al 1988). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, such a study would be limited by the inability to undertake CT scanning in acutely ill, breathless patients. Moreover, measurement of lung volumes, both by helium dilution and by body plethysmography are potentially erroneous in patients with severe airflow limitation [33]. Radiographic planimetry [34] or contiguous CT slices [35] could have been used to avoid such errors in the measurement of lung volume but would have involved a greater radiation burden for the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with high airway resistance, plethysmography may overestimate lung volume. In these subjects, the flow resulting from the motion of upper airway walls during panting may be responsible for a substantial pressure difference between mouth and alveoli [4,26]. In the present subjects, no changes in airway resistance were noted during pregnancy (table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…The two most widely used are multibreath helium equilibration and body plethysmography [1,2]. Classically, it is accepted that in normal individuals and in patients with interstitial lung disease, these two techniques produce equivalent mean values [2][3][4], whereas the helium dilution method underestimates the absolute lung volumes in patients with obstructive lung disease to an extent that depends on the severity of airway obstruction [2,[3][4][5]. Pregnancy could be an exception to this general principle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%