1972
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1107482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erste Erfahrungen mit der duodenoskopischen retrograden Pankreatikographie in der Diagnostik der chronischen Pankreatitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand a normal duct does not rule out chronic pancreatitis with parenchymal destruction. We do, however, not believe, as Wiesner et al(12) do that marked variations in calibre size and irregular outlining of the duct is compatible with normal histology of the gland.Data on length and, more important, on width in "normal" pancreatograms may help to establish guidelines for the analysis of pancreatograms in chronic pancreatitis with only minor ductal changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…On the other hand a normal duct does not rule out chronic pancreatitis with parenchymal destruction. We do, however, not believe, as Wiesner et al(12) do that marked variations in calibre size and irregular outlining of the duct is compatible with normal histology of the gland.Data on length and, more important, on width in "normal" pancreatograms may help to establish guidelines for the analysis of pancreatograms in chronic pancreatitis with only minor ductal changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Wiesner et al (90) described that in patients with chronic pancreatitis the changes in the ductal system consisted of irregular wall pattern, changes in size of lumen, multiple stenosis and dilatation, and entire pancreatic duct enlarge ment, and that ERCP was a valuable addition in the diagnosis of chronic pancre atitis, indications for surgery and choice of surgical method for chronic pancre atitis. Braasch et al (8) reported as typical changes of pancreatitis irregularity of the duct outline, dilatation of the duct and distortion of the position of the duct, and also partial obstruction of the common duct in addition to obstruction of the pancreatic duct.…”
Section: Validity O F the Morphological Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%