2015
DOI: 10.1051/odfen/2014054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eruption abnormalities in permanent molars: differential diagnosis and radiographic exploration

Abstract: Dental eruption is a complex developmental process during which the dental germ moves in a coordinated fashion through time and space as it continues the edification of the root; its 3-dimensional pathway crosses the alveolar bone up to the oral epithelium to reach its final position in the occlusion plane. This local process is regulated by genes expressing in the dental follicle, at critical periods following a precise chronology, bilaterally coordinated with facial growth. Unlike the third molars, in first … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were collected at 4 time points to observe the progression of the condition: (a) half root formation at postnatal day (P) 14, (b) completion of molar root formation and tooth eruption at P25, (c) fully grown mice at P91, and (d) middle‐aged mice at P182. Similar to human PFE conditions, PPR cKO molars exhibited delayed tooth eruption, tooth root anomalies, and defective interradicular bones (Cohen‐Lévy & Cohen, ; Deffrennes & Cohen‐Lévy, ; Pilz et al, ; Figure ). The statistical analysis revealed that the eruption height of cKO first and second molars (Figure i,j red line) was significantly lower than that of Control and cHet molars (Figure i,j black and blue line, respectively), starting from P25 to P182.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data were collected at 4 time points to observe the progression of the condition: (a) half root formation at postnatal day (P) 14, (b) completion of molar root formation and tooth eruption at P25, (c) fully grown mice at P91, and (d) middle‐aged mice at P182. Similar to human PFE conditions, PPR cKO molars exhibited delayed tooth eruption, tooth root anomalies, and defective interradicular bones (Cohen‐Lévy & Cohen, ; Deffrennes & Cohen‐Lévy, ; Pilz et al, ; Figure ). The statistical analysis revealed that the eruption height of cKO first and second molars (Figure i,j red line) was significantly lower than that of Control and cHet molars (Figure i,j black and blue line, respectively), starting from P25 to P182.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, coronal superimposition images show that cKO molars unanimously have truncated and dilacerated roots. These morphological root anomalies of mouse PFE molars are reminiscent of those observed in human PFE molars, which are associated with tooth root abnormality and normal crown morphology (Cohen‐Lévy & Cohen, ; Deffrennes & Cohen‐Lévy, ; Pilz et al, ). Furthermore, there is a significant reduction of the interradicular bone height in cKO first and second molars at P182, indicating defective bone formation in this specific area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[2] This local process is regulated by genes expressing in the dental follicle, at critical periods following a precise chronology, bilaterally coordinated with facial growth. [ 3] Unlike the third molars, in first and second permanent molars eruption abnormalities are relatively rare, estimated at 0.06% by Prece and Grover reported similar prevalence, at 0.08% for second maxillary molars and 0.01% for first mandibular molars. [ 3] More recently, considerably higher prevalence rates were reported in retrospective studies based on orthodontic consultation records: 2.3% for second molar eruption abnormalities as a whole, comprising 1.5% ectopic eruption, 0.2% impaction and 0.6% primary failure of eruption (PFE), and up to 1.36% permanent second molar iimpaction according to Cassetta et al [4] Second molar retention is generally discovered serendipitously, being asymptomatic in 68.5% of cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%