2009
DOI: 10.1093/pasj/61.4.791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eruptions of Magnetic Ropes in Two Homologous Solar Events of 2002 June 1 and 2: a Key to Understanding an Enigmatic Flare

Abstract: The goal of this paper is to understand the drivers, configurations, and scenarios of two similar eruptive events, which occurred in the same solar active region 9973 on 2002 June 1 and 2. The June 2 event was previously studied by Sui, Holman, and Dennis (2006, ApJ, 646, 605; 2008, Adv. Space Res., 41, 976), who concluded that it was challenging for popular flare models. Using multi-spectral data, we analyzed a combination of the two events. Each of the events exhibited an evolving cusp-like feature. We have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All observational facts considered here confirm that we dealt with fast MHD shock waves, initially excited in the low corona by sharply erupting flux ropes, and neither by a flare pressure pulse nor by the outer surface of a CME. The initial impulsive-piston shock excitation during the early flare rise was responsible, with minor variations, for the shocks observed in a number of different events, ranging from the GOES B class up to the X class (Meshalkina et al, 2009;Grechnev et al, 2011bGrechnev et al, , 2014aGrechnev et al, , 2013. The concept, which related the source of a type II emission to the current sheet of a coronal streamer stressed by a shock front, has accounted for the structural features of the observed type II bursts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All observational facts considered here confirm that we dealt with fast MHD shock waves, initially excited in the low corona by sharply erupting flux ropes, and neither by a flare pressure pulse nor by the outer surface of a CME. The initial impulsive-piston shock excitation during the early flare rise was responsible, with minor variations, for the shocks observed in a number of different events, ranging from the GOES B class up to the X class (Meshalkina et al, 2009;Grechnev et al, 2011bGrechnev et al, , 2014aGrechnev et al, , 2013. The concept, which related the source of a type II emission to the current sheet of a coronal streamer stressed by a shock front, has accounted for the structural features of the observed type II bursts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The coronal configuration in Figure 9b resembles an inverted funnel. Such funnels appear above photospheric magnetic islands inside opposite-polarity regions and contain coronal null points (Masson et al, 2009;Meshalkina et al, 2009). The presence of a magnetic island at the photospheric base of the jet was revealed in Article II.…”
Section: Jetmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A correlation between near-Earth proton enhancements and microwave bursts has been known for a long time (Croom, 1971;Castelli and Barron, 1977;Akinian et al, 1978;Melnikov et al, 1991). Kahler (1982) explained this correlation by the "big flare syndrome" (BFS), i.e., a general correspondence between the energy release in an eruptive flare and its various manifestations.…”
Section: Protons Vs 35 Ghz Burst and Cme Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, both open and closed structures of these domains become filled with energetic particles as well as cool plasma of the pre-eruptive filament. Related schemes containing a single null point were discussed by Gary and Moore (2004), Masson, Antiochos, and DeVore (2013), Meshalkina et al (2009), Grechnev et al (2013b), and Uralov et al (2014. Stretching a large-scale quadrupole into the solar wind might cause disappearance of the null point.…”
Section: Appearance Of Accelerated Particles In a Trapmentioning
confidence: 99%