Cytokines in Hemopoiesis, Oncology, and AIDS II 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48715-6_79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erythropoietin Treatment in Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation: A Prospective and Randomized Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has no significant impact on quality of life (QOL) and is not cost effective. [6][7][8][9] Recent EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anemic patients with cancer state that for patients undergoing allo-SCT, the clinical impact of erythropoietins is limited and they can only be recommended on an individual basis. 10 Recently, better understanding of the mechanisms of allogeneic antitumoral control challenged the need for myeloablation during allo-SCT conditioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has no significant impact on quality of life (QOL) and is not cost effective. [6][7][8][9] Recent EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anemic patients with cancer state that for patients undergoing allo-SCT, the clinical impact of erythropoietins is limited and they can only be recommended on an individual basis. 10 Recently, better understanding of the mechanisms of allogeneic antitumoral control challenged the need for myeloablation during allo-SCT conditioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although low levels of serum erythropoietin were documented after standard myeloablative allo-SCT, the use of rHuEPO did not translate into a substantial improvement in erythropoietic recovery or major reduction of RBCT requirements. 6,23,24 Profound myeloablation resulting from standard conditioning is likely to induce elimination of progenitor cells targeted by EPO. This might explain, at least in part, these poor results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…transplantation the benefit of rHuEPO therapy was minimal when it was given early posttransplant [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] but could be optimized when started after day 30 [32], we first administered rHuEPO starting on day 30 after the transplant. However, as the degree of myelosuppression after NMSCT was mild [13], we also started rHuEPO therapy on the day of transplantation in another group of patients, achieving complete Hb correction at similar speed and frequency.…”
Section: Weeks After Nmsctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous trials have shown that there is a major need for efficient erythropoiesis enhancement to alleviate chronic anemia and reduce the high transfusion requirements after HCT. However, recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) therapy offers minimal (in case of allogeneic HCT) or no (in case of autologous HCT) benefit when rHuEPO is started immediately after the transplant [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. On the other hand, we have shown that rHuEPO was remarkably efficient when started around day 30 after transplantation with a myeloablative conditioning regimen, i.e., when endogenous EPO production becomes impaired, and this was true for both allogeneic [32] and autologous [20] HCT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, clinical trials of rhEpo therapy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) resulted in accelerated erythroid engraftment and some reduction in transfusion requirements [17,18,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. However, in all of these studies, the rhEpo dose used was very high (greater than 1000 U/kg/ week) and thus the cost was prohibitive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%