2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2011.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ERα36, a new variant of the ERα is expressed in triple negative breast carcinomas and has a specific transcriptomic signature in breast cancer cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
38
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Histological results examining ERα36 in tumors have shown better prognosis in patients with membrane localization of ERα36 [51]. While this would initially appear to be a divergent result to what we report in the current study, we cannot control for external effects in these patients, such as treatments to which our cells are not exposed in vitro.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Histological results examining ERα36 in tumors have shown better prognosis in patients with membrane localization of ERα36 [51]. While this would initially appear to be a divergent result to what we report in the current study, we cannot control for external effects in these patients, such as treatments to which our cells are not exposed in vitro.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Identifying a novel target is therefore an urgent topic of research. Previous studies report that ER-α36, a variant of conventional ER, is highly expressed in ER-negative tumors, and poorly expressed in ER-positive tumors [25], [32]. The acquired TAM resistance could nevertheless be mediated by ER-α36.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It rapidly activates PKC in response to E 2 , leading to deleterious effects such as enhancement of proliferation, protection against apoptosis, and enhancement of metastatic factors. Moreover, it has been implicated in promoting antiapoptotic and anti-chemotherapeutic effects in triple negative breast cancer [64][65][66]. Cells that have been silenced for ERα36 lack rapid E 2 signaling whereas it is still present in cells silenced for ERα66 [67], Moreover, the experiments used to demonstrate the role of ERα66 as a membrane receptor employed transfection of ER cDNAs into reportedly ERα66 null cells.…”
Section: Alternative Membrane Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%