2013
DOI: 10.2172/1110872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESA Protection for the American Eel: Implications for US Hydropower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dams and hydropower impede the riverine migrations of both juvenile and adult eels (Carr and Whoriskey 2008) and contribute to a broader issue of river fragmentation affecting all migratory river species (Belletti et al 2020; Mulligan et al 2020). In the United States, over 32 GW of existing hydropower capacity at 939 plants are within the current population range of the American Eel (Jager et al 2013). Conventional hydroelectric turbines contribute to higher injury and mortality rates of downstream‐migrating silver‐stage eels as well as juvenile eels (elvers or yellow‐stage eels) that fall back into spillways or turbines during their upstream migration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dams and hydropower impede the riverine migrations of both juvenile and adult eels (Carr and Whoriskey 2008) and contribute to a broader issue of river fragmentation affecting all migratory river species (Belletti et al 2020; Mulligan et al 2020). In the United States, over 32 GW of existing hydropower capacity at 939 plants are within the current population range of the American Eel (Jager et al 2013). Conventional hydroelectric turbines contribute to higher injury and mortality rates of downstream‐migrating silver‐stage eels as well as juvenile eels (elvers or yellow‐stage eels) that fall back into spillways or turbines during their upstream migration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%