2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.edumed.2021.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escala de percepción ante crisis y pandemias: desarrollo y validación de una escala pedagógica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the content of the scale was considered good when it was evaluated under nine aspects by five expert judges. On the other hand, by observing differences in correlations between items of the questionnaire, it is possible to review and address aspects of methodological structure of this strategy from a different contextual perspective [33]. However, thanks to the total item correlation, it was possible to identify items 13 and 15 as negative items, which made it possible to correct the direction of the score on the Likert scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the content of the scale was considered good when it was evaluated under nine aspects by five expert judges. On the other hand, by observing differences in correlations between items of the questionnaire, it is possible to review and address aspects of methodological structure of this strategy from a different contextual perspective [33]. However, thanks to the total item correlation, it was possible to identify items 13 and 15 as negative items, which made it possible to correct the direction of the score on the Likert scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fifth phase reports the validation process for the information obtained, and several procedures were used, specifically, for internal validation, the Cronbach's alpha index (CAI) was calculated, and values greater than 0.70 were accepted (Tuesca-Molina et al, 2021). However, the CAI for latent variables was obtained iteratively because it often improves when an item is eliminated.…”
Section: Figure 2 Initial Model With Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para la validación interna se usó el Índice Alfa de Cronbach (IAC) en cada uno de los tres constructos, lo que permitió estimar la consistencia de las variables observadas, así como su independencia y correlaciones [34], [35] . Se consideró que al acercarse a la unidad el valor IAC en cada ítem, este presentó consistencia interna, pero cuando se aproximó a 0 o a un valor menor de 0.7 careció de consistencia.…”
Section: Fase 4 Análisis Descriptivounclassified