1968
DOI: 10.1029/rg006i004p00553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escape of atmospheric helium by nonthermal processes

Abstract: Several nonthermal mechanims have been proposed to resolve the discrepancy between the rate at which helium is released from the earth's crust and the average rate of thermal escape of the gas. The various mechanisms are examined critically. Loss of its ions from the polar ionosphere appears to be the most likely mechanism controlling the escape of helium.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, it was difficult to understand how a balance could be achieved between losses and gains of SHe in the ter-restrial atmosphere [e.g., MacDonald, 1963;Patterson, 1968]. The suggestion by Johnson and Axford [1969] that auroral precipitation of SHe originating in the solar wind is a significant source at least partially resolved the problem, and it is supported by the observations reported here.…”
Section: This Value Is Very Close To the Value Predicted By Johnson Asupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, it was difficult to understand how a balance could be achieved between losses and gains of SHe in the ter-restrial atmosphere [e.g., MacDonald, 1963;Patterson, 1968]. The suggestion by Johnson and Axford [1969] that auroral precipitation of SHe originating in the solar wind is a significant source at least partially resolved the problem, and it is supported by the observations reported here.…”
Section: This Value Is Very Close To the Value Predicted By Johnson Asupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The average SHe thermal escape flux has been estimated to be •3-6 cm -• s -x [Kockarts and Nicolet, 1962;Johnson and Axford, 1969;Kockarts, 1973]. There should also be a nonthermal escape flux which is at least •1 cm -• s -x, since such a process is required to provide a balance in the atmospheric budget of 4He [Axford, 1968;Patterson, 1968]. In fact, the thermal escape flux may be underestimated because the effects of locally high thermospheric temperatures (such as might be associated with the auroral zones) have not been taken into account.…”
Section: This Value Is Very Close To the Value Predicted By Johnson Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hydrothermal activity also injects significant amounts of the primordial isotope 3 He into the deep water (Clarke et al, 1969;Jenkins et al, 1978). Because of its inertness, paucity in the atmosphere due to ongoing loss to outer space (Stoney, 1905;Turekian, 1959;Axford, 1968;Patterson, 1968), and its low intrinsic solubility in seawater (Weiss, 1971), hydrothermal 3 He anomalies are observed throughout the deep oceans. As importantly, the distribution of the 3 He can be combined with tracer-calibrated ocean models to infer the global flux of hydrothermal 3 He to be ~550 mol/y (we obtain a weighted mean of 550 ± 90 mol/y from the estimates made by Bianchi et al, 2010;Schlitzer, 2016;Holzer et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of accounting for the low terrestrial helium concentration may have at last been solved. Considering the production and loss of terrestrial helium, 4 He concentrations (the principal helium iso tope) and the ratio 4 He/ 3 He are both considerably lower than have been predicted by thermal escape processes [Patterson, 1968]. Axford has proposed a possible solution.…”
Section: Oilier Variationsmentioning
confidence: 98%