2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eschatological scrutiny of unprofessional usage of molecular docking; how unreliability in computational methods arises from amateurish mistakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular docking–based virtual screening is not always accurate and precise in finding the right compounds, and the compounds should be further verified with MD [46]. MD on the best compound was carried out via Desmond v5.3 package [47] by Optimized Potential for Liquid Simulations 3 (OPLS_2005) force field and Single Point Charge water model for 50 ns and 1000 frames, using NPT ensemble (constant number of atoms, constant pressure, i.e., 1.01325 bar and constant temperature, i.e., 300 K) on an orthorhombic periodic boundary condition with 0.15 M solution of NaCl to mimic the ionic strength of cellular environment [48].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular docking–based virtual screening is not always accurate and precise in finding the right compounds, and the compounds should be further verified with MD [46]. MD on the best compound was carried out via Desmond v5.3 package [47] by Optimized Potential for Liquid Simulations 3 (OPLS_2005) force field and Single Point Charge water model for 50 ns and 1000 frames, using NPT ensemble (constant number of atoms, constant pressure, i.e., 1.01325 bar and constant temperature, i.e., 300 K) on an orthorhombic periodic boundary condition with 0.15 M solution of NaCl to mimic the ionic strength of cellular environment [48].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%