2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48532-4_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escher-like Tilings with Weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Koizumi and Sugihara originally placed the same number of points on every tiling edge. Later, Imahori et al [3] suggested in the conclusion of their paper that it is also possible to place different numbers of points on each tiling edge. We denote the numbers of points placed on the tiling edges (white circles in the figure) as k 1 , k 2 , .…”
Section: Parameterization Of Isohedral Tilingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Koizumi and Sugihara originally placed the same number of points on every tiling edge. Later, Imahori et al [3] suggested in the conclusion of their paper that it is also possible to place different numbers of points on each tiling edge. We denote the numbers of points placed on the tiling edges (white circles in the figure) as k 1 , k 2 , .…”
Section: Parameterization Of Isohedral Tilingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization problem (10) is known as the Rayleigh quotient; the optimal value is the maximum eigenvalue of B ⊤ V B and the optimal solution ξ * is the eigenvector associated with the maximum eigenvalue (the length is arbitrary). By utilizing the fact that B ⊤ V B is a symmetric positive semidefinite matrix of maximum rank two, Imahori et al [3] proposed a projection method [11] to compute the maximum eigenvalue and its corresponding eigenvector in O(n 2 ) time.…”
Section: Escherization Problem As An Eigenvalue Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The exhaustive search of the templates was very time-consuming because (i) the order of K i is O(n 3 ) for IH5 and IH6 and O(n 4 ) for IH4 (see Fig. 3), and (ii) for each combination of i and k, it took O(n 3 ) time for computing eval E ikj for all j ∈ J [6,5]. As a compromise, Imahori and Sakai [6] proposed a local search algorithm to search only promising configurations of (k, j) ∈ (K i , J) for each isohedral type i ∈ I.…”
Section: Koizumi and Sugihara's Formulation And Its Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%