1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90010-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
117
6
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
11
117
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as seen in the questionnaire (Item 22), these students wanted to have feedback from both the teacher and peers, and as revealed in the interview, it was known that the former assisted them with language while the latter helped them with ideas. These results are thus different from those of previous studies (Fei, 2006;Nelson & Carson, 1998;Tsui & Ng, 2000) which found the resistance of students with entrenched teachercentered learning experiences to peer-feedback. The success of this study, however, could be due to many factors, such as (1) the step-by-step training on peer response, (2) the way this activity was implemented in class, (3) grading and (4) the school's permission to revise the curriculum.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as seen in the questionnaire (Item 22), these students wanted to have feedback from both the teacher and peers, and as revealed in the interview, it was known that the former assisted them with language while the latter helped them with ideas. These results are thus different from those of previous studies (Fei, 2006;Nelson & Carson, 1998;Tsui & Ng, 2000) which found the resistance of students with entrenched teachercentered learning experiences to peer-feedback. The success of this study, however, could be due to many factors, such as (1) the step-by-step training on peer response, (2) the way this activity was implemented in class, (3) grading and (4) the school's permission to revise the curriculum.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Peers are not teachers, and it is the teachers who are more capable of knowing how to help students become better writers (Carson & Nelson, 1996;Nelson & Carson, 1998;Yang et al, 2006). However, that does not mean that L2 learners of writing are unable to benefit from peer feedback at all.…”
Section: Pedagogical Challenges Of Collaborative L2 Writing Via Freelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implications might be twofold: (1) AfL takes effect as students are engaged in a collaborative learning process where they "learn from and support each other" (Carless, 2011, p.165); (2) in addition to the findings by previous studies (e.g. Connor & Asenavage, 1994;Nelson & Carson, 1998), learners still perceived peer feedback of limited benefit even after two-year in-depth and sustainable implementation of AfL.…”
Section: Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%