2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3228240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in a First Degree Relative Increases Risk for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant higher pooled prevalence of familial OAC was found in the three studies 33,35,45 that confirmed the positive family history (10.0%; 95% CI: 6.4‐15.4; I 2 = 8%) compared with the four studies 32,36,37,40 with no confirmation of family history (2.5%; 95% CI: 1.6‐3.9; I 2 = 8%, P < 0.001). The prevalence for familial BO in the three studies that verified a positive family history 33,35,45 was also higher than in the three studies that did not verify family history 32,43,44 (10.6%; 95% CI: 3.7‐26.6; I 2 = 90% vs 7.3%; 95% CI: 5.6‐9.3; I 2 = 0%), but this difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.48).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A significant higher pooled prevalence of familial OAC was found in the three studies 33,35,45 that confirmed the positive family history (10.0%; 95% CI: 6.4‐15.4; I 2 = 8%) compared with the four studies 32,36,37,40 with no confirmation of family history (2.5%; 95% CI: 1.6‐3.9; I 2 = 8%, P < 0.001). The prevalence for familial BO in the three studies that verified a positive family history 33,35,45 was also higher than in the three studies that did not verify family history 32,43,44 (10.6%; 95% CI: 3.7‐26.6; I 2 = 90% vs 7.3%; 95% CI: 5.6‐9.3; I 2 = 0%), but this difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.48).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Nonetheless, one study including 26 OAC patients showed a significantly lower proportion of males in the familial OAC group, 44 whereas the remaining studies found no differences in gender between sporadic and familial BO/OAC. Two studies reported a lower age at BO or OAC diagnosis for patients with familial BO/OAC compared with sporadic BO (mean age: 58 vs 64 years) 32,44 . This was not found in three other studies 34,35,45 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations