“…Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Otago Ethics Committee. To obtain a consistent set of diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of FMD, all reports of male patients previously diagnosed with the condition and described in sufficient detail were evaluated and phenotypic characteristics tabulated [Gorlin and Cohen, 1969; Holt et al, 1972; Danks and Mayne, 1974; Sauvegrain et al, 1975; Weiss et al, 1975, 1976; Kassner et al, 1976; Medlar and Crawford, 1978; Sellars and Beighton, 1978; Kanemura et al, 1979; Ullrich et al, 1979; Beighton and Hamersma, 1980; Fitzsimmons et al, 1982; Jend‐Rossmann et al, 1984; Leggett, 1988; Glass and Rosenbaum, 1995; Nishimura et al, 1995; Ehrenstein et al, 1997; Franceschini et al, 1997; Kung and Sloan, 1998; Boduroglu and Tuncbilek, 1999; Vinay et al, 2000; Morava et al, 2003; Zenker et al, 2004; Stefanova et al, 2005] (Tables I and II). Characteristics were divided into mandatory, major and minor features on account of their frequency and specificity for the disorder.…”