2017
DOI: 10.1177/0300060517706827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Esophageal foreign bodies in adults with different durations of time from ingestion to effective treatment

Abstract: ObjectiveThis study was performed to identify the differences in clinical characteristics, operative methods, complications, and postoperative hospitalization stays for adults with esophageal foreign bodies with different durations of time from ingestion to effective treatment.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 221 patients with a diagnosis of a foreign body in the esophagus, confirmed by rigid esophagoscopy, flexible esophagoscopy, or surgery. The differences between the two groups (Gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the patients in our study who intentionally ingested FBs were male; however, there was no significant difference between male and female in the general population [2,9]. Most of the patients with intentional ingestion were prisoners in custody, and they could be considered as seeking secondary gains through access to a medical facility or even manipulative attempts to escape incarceration, which was similar to findings in a previous study [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Most of the patients in our study who intentionally ingested FBs were male; however, there was no significant difference between male and female in the general population [2,9]. Most of the patients with intentional ingestion were prisoners in custody, and they could be considered as seeking secondary gains through access to a medical facility or even manipulative attempts to escape incarceration, which was similar to findings in a previous study [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Rigid endoscopy is preferably used for the removal of foreign body from the esophagus in some eastern clinical practices with high success rates and low complica-tions. [15,16] The authors have advocated that rigid endoscopy is more appropriate for proximal esophagus and more advantageous to remove the bigger chunks of food or foreign body due to the wider lumen for manipulation. However, some studies have claimed that the procedural duration is longer in rigid endoscopy compared to flexible and that the latter provides better examination of the esophageal mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are commonly observed in the pediatric population. Ingestion of foreign bodies by adults is generally accidental, seen commonly in edentulous patients and under the in uence of alcohol [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some patients with impacted foreign bodies do not go to the hospital for help but stay at home for observation. This prolongs the time from ingestion to effective treatment and causes greater harm and an economic burden for the patient [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%