2018
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1526317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Esophageal foreign bodies in adults: systematic review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
72
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
72
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies demonstrate that patients >80 years are more likely to have FB ingestion. 7 In this cohort, age distribution was approximately normal distribution, with peak between 55 and 65 years. The fact that physiologically lacking of teeth and swallowing disorders occur with the increase in age may contribute to the high risk of FB ingestion in elderly patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies demonstrate that patients >80 years are more likely to have FB ingestion. 7 In this cohort, age distribution was approximately normal distribution, with peak between 55 and 65 years. The fact that physiologically lacking of teeth and swallowing disorders occur with the increase in age may contribute to the high risk of FB ingestion in elderly patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…And about two-thirds or more EFBI lodge at the upper esophagus, especially at the level of the cricopharyngeal sphincter, which is the most narrowing area. 7,33,34 In this cohort, 96.8% of FBs lodged at upper esophagus, among which two-thirds located around the cricopharyngeal sphincter. The higher proportion is mainly because of the multidisciplinary collaboration following the procedure in Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In adults, most ingested foreign bodies pass spontaneously 1,17 ; however, 10-20% of EFB ingestion cases require medical intervention 8 . Previous studies focused on the impaction site, type of EFB, chief complaints, DOI, management, and complications 18 . Few studies divided EFBs into different shapes, such as sharp or blunt EFBs 19 ; when they did so, such classification was general and inconsistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, non-radiopaque FBs can be suspected in the presence of a widened prevertebral shadow, loss of cervical lordosis and radiolucency (air trapping). An emergent endoscopic retrieval of a FB is indicated if a complete obstruction is suspected 2. Pharmacological management of oesophageal soft bolus impaction may be used in selected patients with caution 3…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%