2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02187-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Esophagography and chest CT for detection of perforated esophagus: what factors influence accuracy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computed tomography (CT) plays an important role in guiding management particularly in assessing the location, size, and extent of contamination. The sensitivity of CT in diagnosis of a perforation ranges from 50 to 100% [22][23][24]. Contained perforations or mucosal tears do prove to be more of a challenge to diagnose, which contribute to decreased sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomography (CT) plays an important role in guiding management particularly in assessing the location, size, and extent of contamination. The sensitivity of CT in diagnosis of a perforation ranges from 50 to 100% [22][23][24]. Contained perforations or mucosal tears do prove to be more of a challenge to diagnose, which contribute to decreased sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CT esophagography has superior sensitivity and specificity to fluoroscopy for diagnosing esophageal perforation in the native esophagus, fluoroscopy and CT are complementary in the postoperative patient with concurrent review of both modalities resulting in greater sensitivity and specificity 10,19,21. This is exemplified in Figure 6 where CT obtained post-esophagectomy is concerning for contained leak but fluoroscopic examination shows contrast is not fixed in that area, suggesting the CT findings are a result of redundant stomach 10…”
Section: Considerations In the Postoperative Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, fluoroscopic esophagography has been used in the initial evaluation of suspected esophageal perforation, with CT esophagography performed to confirm leak and guide possible surgical management 4,7. Studies have shown that CT esophagography has superior sensitivity and negative predictive value for esophageal perforations and is much less time, resource, and personnel intensive compared with fluoroscopy 3,4,7,10…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the diagnosis still remains in question after contrast esophagography, CT esophagography can be performed to help increase the sensitivity for discovering an esophageal perforation. 12 A recent study showed that use of both CT with oral contrast and a routine esophagram could improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of an esophageal perforation, but small contained leaks can be difficult to visualize with either modality. This study compared over 100 paired exams of patients suspected to have an esophageal perforation and included 33 trauma patients.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study compared over 100 paired exams of patients suspected to have an esophageal perforation and included 33 trauma patients. 12 Most of the data supporting paired diagnostic modalities, however, are on patients with nontraumatic esophageal perforations.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%